The click bait that "Climate Change is going to kill all of us" has been dominate for many years. Nothing else comes close.
Except scientists are saying global warming is a big deal, & scientists are saying sun spots aren't a big deal. See, this story is just con click bait because it's confirmation bias against global warming
Yeah show me an un-adjusted world-wide temperature chart using the raw data instead of "adjusted" fake temperatures --- and then use this chart to explain to me how the world is warming due to CO2 to an extent that it is dangerous for man.
Are they pretty much the same people? Initial projections are done on what will happen without extraordinary remediation. Is that really so hard to understand?
Actually this is what NASA said.... Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Expects Global Cooling https://www.thestreet.com/mishtalk/...-warming-hysteria-nasa-expects-global-cooling From - NASA Sees Climate Cooling Trend Thanks to Low Sun Activity. “We see a cooling trend,” said Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold.” The new data is coming from NASA’s Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry or SABER instrument, which is onboard the space agency’s Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) satellite. SABER monitors infrared radiation from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances that play a vital role in the energy output of our thermosphere, the very top level of our atmosphere. “The thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimum. It’s one of the most important ways the solar cycle affects our planet,” said Mlynczak, who is the associate principal investigator for SABER. The new NASA findings are in line with studies released by UC-San Diego and Northumbria University in Great Britain last year, both of which predict a Grand Solar Minimum in coming decades due to low sunspot activity. Both studies predicted sun activity similar to the Maunder Minimum of the mid-17th to early 18th centuries, which coincided to a time known as the Little Ice Age, during which temperatures were much lower than those of today. If all of this seems as if NASA is contradicting itself, you’re right — sort of. After all, NASA also reported last week that Arctic sea ice was at its sixth lowest level since measuring began. Isn’t that a sure sign of global warming? All any of this “proves” is that we have, at best, a cursory understanding of Earth’s incredibly complex climate system. So when mainstream media and carbon-credit salesman Al Gore breathlessly warn you that we must do something about climate change, it’s all right to step back, take a deep breath, and realize that we don’t have the knowledge, skill or resources to have much effect on the Earth’s climate. (More at above url)
Intial projections are very often wrong, many times they are completely wrong. The knee jerk extraordinary measures which are suggested as a remedy then need to be adjusted accordingly. That is where things breakdown. The adjustments never happen, they just keep being repeated as if the intial projections were right on the money, and it seems to me that this only happens when there's a political end game in mind.
This is why "global warming" was changed to "global climate change" a few years ago. These scientists are smart. They should feed their families no matter what.