Your thinking is a wonderful anachronism. Had you been expressing these views in the early 1980s you'd have an enthusiastic following. Today, however, as the pendulum, having completed its period of left swing and right swing and returned close to equilibrium, is about to begin its left swing again. I estimate the period of our U.S. political pendulum at approximately 80-100 years. Your extreme right views that align so very well with the extreme right swing of the pendulum are approximately 40-50 years out of step. (it has taken about about 20-25 years to go from near equilibrium to the extreme right and another 20-25 to return to near the equilibrium point, we are now about to embark on a swing to the left. Expect a similar 50 year journey back to near equilibrium, if history is any guide.
My views are mainstream American traditional constitutional views. They are not far right. They are normal views.
You know for years Cigarettes were pushed as healthy without any science backing it up. Science and proof are important when evaluating claims. As far as we know there is a consensus among lefties that there are more than 2 genders... in fact you team claims as many as 50 genders. There is no to science back it up. Even your fake consensus does not state Man Made CO2 is causing warming. So until you bring accepted and repeatable science that man made co2 is causing warming... you are no different than the people pushing 50 genders. Its propaganda.
Who won the day? There are scientists fighting it out on this issue and you think with your logic that couldn't fill a sperm that you won the day. I guess since it is cold outside you won the argument. Let's pick up the argument in 7 months then. Scientist are still disagreeing but the geniuses here at ET got it nailed.
Who really thinks they won the day? Most of the people bringing up the cold are just returning the trolls from people like Futurecurrents and Dem leaders. Most thinking people realize there is the science is non conclusive so you we can't really Know. I believe until there is some proof we should be spending some of the agw money on cleaning oceans and creating fresh water.