He'll never understand anything not drawn out with crayons. Stop trying. He's a lunatic. And as far as OUR health... Can you believe this out of control mess wants to control OUR bodies???? It's absolutely South Carolina's right to block the feds from OVER STEPPING bounds. Last, the leftists will never last if they pull some rioting, shooting, leading to war. They're the first ones to cry unfair when they run out of nerf gun darts and their buddies didn't. I pray we don't have a revolution, even though one's sadly necessary at this point.
Of course not jem.There are numerous ways to force SC to comply such as The Feds opening and running the exchanges and forcing compliance through The IRS and taxes.There is also the extreme of withholding all federal dollars to SC including stopping medicare payments,SS payments,road funds etc.None of that will happen though,SC will comply BTW,can post a link to some successful cases of nullification ? (Hint,there are none)
I gave cases already... you have to think. Every state which has passed medical marijuana laws are proof of state nullification.
No,those are cases Obama chose not to pursue.We both know that wont happen with Obamacare.There are many cases where The President or the feds chose not to fight a state law that was in conflict with federal law,that is not nullification.Every time the feds fight a state law that conflicts with federal law,the feds win http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_(U.S._Constitution) Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional. The theory of nullification has never been legally upheld;[1] rather, the Supreme Court has rejected it. The theory of nullification has been rejected repeatedly by the courts. The courts have found that under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, federal law is superior to state law, and that under Article III of the Constitution, the federal judiciary has the final power to interpret the Constitution. Therefore, the power to make final decisions about the constitutionality of federal laws lies with the federal courts, not the states, and the states do not have the power to nullify federal laws. Between 1798 and the beginning of the Civil War in 1861, several states threatened or attempted nullification of various federal laws, including the Supreme Court of Wisconsin's ruling in 1854 that the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was unconstitutional. None of these efforts were legally upheld. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were rejected by the other states. The Supreme Court rejected nullification attempts in a series of decisions in the 19th century, including Ableman v. Booth, which found that Wisconsin did not have the power to nullify the Fugitive Slave Act. The Civil War ended most nullification efforts. In the 1950s, southern states attempted to use nullification and interposition to prevent integration of their schools. These attempts failed when the Supreme Court again rejected nullification in Cooper v. Aaron, explicitly holding that the states may not nullify federal law.
South Carolina Health Insurance Market Among Least Competitive: AMA The AMA report said Blue Cross and Blue Shield holds 60 percent of South Carolinaâs health insurance market, with Cigna next at 15 percent. --------- Also, List of states with dominate insurer and market share ---------- And the americans continue to preach about capitalism and competition and yada yada yada.
Southern states have tried nullification many times and every time they have failed,yet you southern conservatives think it will work now...The heart and soul of the conservative mind.
Maybe if Democraps would have ever allowed the public to purchase insurance across state lines there would have been more nationwide competition. When you close off a markets from each other you invite inefficiencies and stifle competition.