Small company from Trump Interior chief's hometown wins massive contract to restore PR's power

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Oct 24, 2017.

  1. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    If you know so much, why not enlighten us why this is so normal for a company to over charge while the CEO who hires them ignores what other states did while he continue to lie about the deal.
     
    #61     Oct 27, 2017
  2. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    They are not overcharging
    Who cares what other states did - do you understand anything about contracts and bids and tenders and awards?

    Everyone is a liar in your pathetic, partisan existence.
     
    #62     Oct 27, 2017
    traderob likes this.
  3. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Who cares? This is the government, not your Oxycontin buying spree where you depend on relationships from shady figures. The CEO didn't follow protocol, is lying about what's happening while they are being overcharged.

    And tell me how a Republican congressman in charge of oversight saying something fishy is partisan. Who is he partisan against?
     
    #63     Oct 27, 2017
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is sounding an alarm over Puerto Rico’s $300 million contract with a small Montana company to restore power infrastructure, amid concerns over the firm's tiny staff and lack of competitive bidding.

    FEMA will be responsible for paying for the work by Whitefish Energy Holdings, but the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), the island’s utility, entered into the contract.

    http://thehill.com/policy/energy-en...ificant-concerns-with-puerto-ricos-300m-power
     
    #64     Oct 27, 2017
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    "The most recent version of the contract between PREPA and Whitefish states that FEMA had "reviewed and approved" it for compliance with its disaster recovery regulations. And Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rosselló said in a Wednesday letter to the Department of Homeland Security that the contract “appeared to comply 100% with FEMA regulations.”"
     
    #65     Oct 27, 2017
  6. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Obviously they weren't given all the details given the 'relationships' involved.
     
    #66     Oct 27, 2017
  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Since it is a direct quote from the article you posted then obviously you must fully agree with the assertion.
     
    #67     Oct 27, 2017
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #68     Oct 27, 2017
  9. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    Boom.
    Keep looking for shit that isn't there Exgroper
     
    #69     Oct 28, 2017
  10. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    He might just be a fucking idiot? Like you?
     
    #70     Oct 28, 2017