zero sense is your narrow viewpoint. a central spot is where highly paid professionals can congregate with their own kind and enjoy the additional amenities including good restaurants and entertainment.
please, since when have "poor" people ever reaped anything in the United States. The country and system is designed to benefit the top 1%, not the bottom 50%. Can we get back to being real?
...which Google, Microsoft, and a number other large firms have proven means nothing not only to the company bottom line, nor to the corporate culture, nor the well-being of its employees and stakeholders. I side with those companies rather than accepting your vitriol unless of course you want to start providing arguments other than shooting around with your crooked revolver.
Well then here it is: The fact that All three companies take good care of their employees in terms of food choices, holiday allowance, free time, work hours, ability to exercise, assistance with commutes including corporate means of transportation you can easily GOOGLE. P.S.: Please let's not AGAIN argue just for the sake of you wanting to disagree. I provided proof and if you still think IT firms must be in the SF city center then please it is your turn to provide proof.
I talked about development/programming jobs. Please read more carefully next time. Please remind us why a start up has to be in the city center? Their constrained budgets should even more so dictate them to be outside the city
. a central spot is where highly paid professionals can congregate with their own kind and enjoy the additional amenities including good restaurants and entertainment.