Not being able to follow the thread of an argument is one reason why you're such an idiot. So you're not a facist like I am not a marxist. Congratulations you got the point without realizing. They didn't write "God". They hand wrote nature's god. Not semantics , but the age of Enlightenment. You should get yourself some.
so by calling me something I am not that means you are not marxist? did you learn that in that in the troll course on goebbels logic? Then they wrote Creator with a big C. Read the document you might learn something. All proof that use Natural Law is consistent with Creator... contrary to your troll lies.
Come on. Are you really this slow..... it's a case of what's good for the goose. By calling me something I am not doesn't mean you are not a fascist either. No they really didn't write 'Creator with a big C'. Jefferson's hand written draft shows you how they did no such thing. As an after thought or at best second thought, the words "their creator" are added. Somewhere between that and getting through Congress it morphs into "their Creator". That's the thing with the religiously deluded. You make crap up all the time. Lower case "nature's god" becomes the single word "God". Lower case "their creator" is truncated to big C "Creator". You being illogical and irrational is no proof at all. Natural law is consistent to natural law being natural. Determined by nature. God is supernatural, you know imaginary friend supernatural, determined by make believe and superstition. Natural law is the higher appeal for when a government, a King or a God messes up.
Wow, what a STUpid troll you are. In essence you're trying to claim that although the founders used the words "God" and "Creator" they didn't mean either.
Stu is once again arguing with the Founders... I will add bold to the words which show how boldly ignorant stu is. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Neither founders or finished Declaration use the word "God" by itself. Looks like you two are not incapable of having a domestic via me without even knowing it. What you goofs are still obviously ignorant of unlike most reasonable folk, is that governments Kings and Gods change. Natural law is the higher appeal over all of them .
Well, I suppose that's your right - to suggest and make guesses as you see fit. As an atheist, it isn't shocking to which direction your interpretations will slant. But they are interpretations nonetheless. Neither you nor I nor anyone in this thread can say for certain either way. This is why getting into a discussion on God with an atheist is silly - neither side can prove anything.
That's why grandpa always said, "never argue religion or politics (or Ford vs. Chevy) at the dinner table."
Grandpa was trying to keep the peace. You can argue either topic wherever you want, but personally I do my best to stay out of the religious topics because it's so difficult to disprove most assertions. At least in politics, there are some facts. With religion, I usually find myself battling either atheists or rabid zealots.