Simple Profitable Method - Take 2

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by jimns, Apr 30, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    You can't see logic & probably suffer from dislexia as you can't seem to be able to understand or mix up words with numbers, that's your fault

    Allaces28 - a tradedwizard, a maverick of finanacial markets that can only prove his ability to Asian hookers, as they are the only ones that are smart enough to accept Monopoly currency
     
    #231     May 24, 2007
  2. Allaces

    Allaces

    Tell us all again how 3 heads in a row enhances the chances of a tail on the 4th toss.. that just never gets old :p

    JSSPMK - The Mental Defective That Failed Math
     
    #232     May 24, 2007
  3. Allaces

    Allaces

    It's been 30 pages since GTS said this:

    Quote from GTS: (page 10)

    "The only thing more amazing than JSSPMK's original statement about the increased odds of winning a BJ hand after a string of losers is his rebuttal to jimns that if you want "proof" you should play a few hands and see for yourself.

    Sorry, after that it's hard to give anything posted by JSSPMK much credence."


    Since then it's been 30 pages of JSSPMK's little tantrum dummy spit :p
     
    #233     May 24, 2007
  4. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    Actually, not quite. Half of last 30 page content I've been trying to explain to you what I've said, unsuccesfully, the other half was you doing what you do best - clowning around.

    Allaces28 - creator of MACD 0 line cross, bravo!

    P.S. You do realise this thread is destined for closure now, just like all your other threads under different usernames/aliases? I wonder why you attract mods attention so much, as if they are flys & you...well you would be the turd obviously.
     
    #234     May 24, 2007
  5. Allaces

    Allaces

    GTS nailed you 30 pages ago and you've been crying ever since :p

    JSSPMK - The Bawling Baby
     
    #235     May 24, 2007
  6. rcj

    rcj

    #236     May 24, 2007
  7. Allaces

    Allaces

    I think proposing JSSPMK and I are Bayesian and Frequentist's is gilding the lily somewhat rjc :p
     
    #237     May 24, 2007
  8. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    I think he realised later what I was saying, even though he does not agree with it, he does not deny the unlikelyhood of a repetitive cycle continueing indefinetely, especially when it is a 50/50 chance.
     
    #238     May 24, 2007
  9. Allaces

    Allaces

    No he basically called you a moron and refused to give anything you said after that any credence.. but keep crying, it's hysterical :p
     
    #239     May 24, 2007
  10. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    Your comments have been noted
     
    #240     May 24, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.