Simple Profitable Method - Take 2

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by jimns, Apr 30, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Allaces

    Allaces

    No you are lost in the gamblers fallacy that the chances of a tails is increased with 3 heads in a row... or that 3 losers in BJ increases the chances of a winner... wrong wrong wrong... you made a fool out of yourself and should have cut your losses many pages ago
     
    #111     May 23, 2007
  2. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    Open your eyes wide and read word for word that I've written, repeat if you have to. I did not say that there is any sort of Holy Grail in this, nor did I proclaim it to be a solid strategy of any sort.

    You and GTS seem to be concerned way too much with my statement being in line with a gamblers fallacy, quite frankly I don't care one way or the other. All I can tell you is that if you were to do what I mentioned in the original post, then you would find that I was correct in stating what I did. You will find that a winning hand happens pretty often after so many losing hands if you stick to the rules. All you keep saying here by means of repeatition that I am lieing basically, that it can't be so, because you have previously tested a similar (similar) things with a roulette, Duh!

    BTW if you use o line cross on 2 min frame (and you said you take them all) then I hope others will see that you also follow "gamblers fallacy" by assuming all of them would turn out to be profitable :) Why do you take them all?
     
    #112     May 23, 2007
  3. How many coin tosses does it take to get to an average of 50/50?

    Ten? Fifty? A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand?

    If things got out of whack (like 250 heads/300 tails) eventually
    it would have to start reverting back to 50:50.

    But when?
     
    #113     May 23, 2007
  4. Allaces

    Allaces

    No they don't, they happen exactly as often as any other time.. you propose a mathematical impossibility and you sound ignorant and childish when you stomp your feet and pout over it
     
    #114     May 23, 2007
  5. Allaces

    Allaces

    Are you 5 years old or don't read before you post? I said the losers are small and the winners tall.. you have no hope in this business.. back to the casino for you
     
    #115     May 23, 2007
  6. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    One thing for sure, you will always be an asshole
     
    #116     May 23, 2007
  7. Allaces

    Allaces

    Yeah well this asshole is trying to set you straight.. a bigger asshole cant admit when he is wrong and tries to blame everyone else
     
    #117     May 23, 2007
  8. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    1. I am not wrong for stating what I did;
    2. I don't recall blaming anyone.

    You need new glasses
     
    #118     May 23, 2007
  9. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

     
    #119     May 23, 2007
  10. Allaces

    Allaces

    1: You were laughingly, embarrassingly wrong as many have already told you

    2: You acted like a stubborn child throwing a tantrum when people tried to help you

    You need a new personality
     
    #120     May 23, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.