They're throwing terrorism charges on top of Faux is to be believed (lol) Eh...I'm more with the Chinese approach in such clear cut cases
I'm not sure I totally agree with that. If someone borrows my car and goes insane and decides to run someone down with it, I go to jail? With a gun it is very different. Someone borrows or takes a gun I didn't secure (guns have but one purpose) then I see it. Cars? Someone could borrow my car because they need to get to the store. Then they lose their mind.
I have no idea what is in his phone or what other evidence they have so I’m not informed enough to call it one way or the other on the terrorism stuff. The age thing is concerning to me.
Put them down, shallow grave, no need to waste tax player's money rehabilitating their kind. Psychopathy is not a trait that we need in the gene pool lest it ends up in the white House again
So, you believe there should be financial liability in the case of the car - also in the case of the gun? Or do you believe in criminal liability in the case of the car and the gun? Its hard to get to what you believe because you're not elaborating.
Progress, not perfection. And yes, financial liability for the gun and car, criminal liability according to motive, or recklessness.