Actually it is, "No one should be ASKED to leave". This is not equivalent to, "No, [stay] you've done more good than bad". It's not same thing. Got it?? :-/
Okay, but it doesn't say no one should be asked to leave BUT JIMMY, does it? So if no one should be asked to leave, then neither should James. So by voting the third option, you are saying no he shouldn't leave, becauase no one should be asked to leave. Or did you think it meant the opposite? "Yes you should leave, because no one should be asked to leave"? Yeah, that makes a whole lot of sense. Look, as I said to you, both votes mean "no", they just differ in their reasons as to why. I know you've put up a few posts in this thread so right now I imagine your ego is saying to you to "keep fighting", even though I'm sure your brain understands you're wrong on this one. Listen to your brain and cut your losses.
No they are not the same thing, but neither are "yes" votes to leave either. Both (b) and (c) say "no" to leaving. You disgruntled democrats sure play dirty. First, Longshit stuffs the ballot box late wednesday evening by voting 10 times in a row for (a). He's caught in a statistical faux pas (over 1,000 to 1 that it was legit), so he then cries that those who voted for (c) do not count. All votes count, even those in the Florida pan-handle and those from the military. These Gore tactics are embarrassing for you. And in one last pathethic attempt to alter public opinion, he shamelessly tries to reconstruct the meaning of "no one should be asked to leave". "Con"clusion: this fraud has learned too many sleazy tactics from the Gore 2000 camp, and unfair elections is his game. Subtract 10 votes from (a), and you have your REAL count. James stays.
Those that vote c) secretly may or may not want jimmie to leave [who can know] but just don't believe ANYONE should be ASKED to leave on general principle. So, by voting "c" are they saying "please stay jimmie"?? Nope. They're simply saying we are NOT going to ASK you [either way]. Jimmie says he will go if majority ASK him to leave. The majority say please leave 30 - 16. Therefore, jimmie must leave NOW! Is this clearing up for you?? :-/
I dare you to post a copy of JUST ONE post by our Little Boy Blue that actually added some value to ET. If you do, I'll rescind my vote.
Regardless of whether or not those that vote (c) "secretly want" Jimmy to leave, they believe that he should not be asked to leave; which is the same as saying he should stay. Get it? Given that their principle is that no one should be asked to leave, they, by implication, believe that Jimmy should not be asked to leave. And it's not "either way". They didn't vote "no one should be asked to leave or stay". Which is what would have been required for the argument you are making. They clearly expressed that no should be asked to leave. Whether they believe no should be asked to stay, to post or to say a Hail Mary is information that we are simply not privy to. And Jimmy didn't say he would leave if "the majority ASK him to leave". He said if the poll received sufficient reponse he would "honor" it. But nice try.
Waggie, truth be told, I actually voted for him to leave. But, being the man of principles that I am, I feel compelled to stick up for him in the face of this blatant abuse of power by this ET lynch mob. ps -- I actually couldn't care if he stayed or left, and if I could've I would've voted "don't care". Alas, that option wasn't available!
Your sinking deeper and deeper. 1) WHERE does it say "Jimmy says he will go if the majority ASK him to leave"? You say this was said, so show US where it was said. 2) Why do you never rebute statistical evidence that you voted 10 times late wednesday evening? The odds of this happening in a legit manner are over 1,000 to 1. 3) Why don't you understand that when someone asks "should I leave?" and the answer is "no one should be asked to leave", that these people are saying "NO!" Longshit, you are proving no high school education and no statistics classes are a deadly mix in the intellect of life.