Short Stock Borrowing Costs

Discussion in 'Trading' started by VTTrader, Jul 14, 2012.

  1. I wrote an article discussing these borrowing costs for CFA magazine, here is the link:

    http://premarketinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/cfm.v23.n1.pdf

    You have to be really careful to check these costs if you're holding stocks short over a longer period of time. I know SHLD was over 60%/yr at one point last year. These borrowing costs can make longer term short positions cost prohibitive.
     
    #11     Jul 15, 2012
  2. The OP should quote the ATM synthetic to solve for mkt rates on any potential short. It's fungible and will solve for mkt vs. broker's rates.
     
    #12     Jul 15, 2012
  3. There is no decay -- the synthetic is delta1 -- the discount is analogous to shorting a zero in FI.
     
    #13     Jul 15, 2012
  4. The criteria varies from broker to broker, but in general, a the broker's clearing firm will have its general amount of stock that they are long. In addition the clearing will have a relationship with other clearing firms that they can borrow stock from the other firms general pool. Sometimes if these pools start to decrease then the firm with the amount of stock left with charge a rate that is passed to you with or without a markup depending on the broker.

    Now it can get more complicated with clearing firms not really locating the stock or that was loaned changes ownership therefore trigger buyins. etc...
     
    #14     Jul 15, 2012
  5. There's no prefect hard criteria but if 30% of the float is short then you should watch out.

    The hard to borrow stocks are the ones institutions think make really good shorts and are therefore willing to pay high interest rates to borrow them, and therefore the brokers charge high interest rates. Interactive brokers lets you check pretty easily what they charge.

    Since I am a fundamental equity analyst, I can offer some guidelines which I don't think you'd necessary be able to apply.

    If firms think a blow up is inminent, such as stock CALL, they will pay high rates of borrow (Interactive is charging about 80% right now), even if the shorts outstanding is about 30% of float. However, for a stock like USG, which is more a valuation short, people will not pay as much (Interactive charging about 2%), eventhough the short oustanding is still 30% of float.
     
    #15     Jul 15, 2012
  6. VTTrader

    VTTrader

    A sincere thank-you to everyone who's posted the very useful information and links here (all of which I've followed up and read)!
     
    #16     Jul 16, 2012