Sheriff Joe To Vet Obama's Eligibility

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Feb 29, 2012.

  1. Brass

    Brass

    Too low a percentage for you? You have already waddled and quacked like a duck. Don't trouble yourself with damage control. Just continue dog-whistling your way to full agreement with your fowl friends.
     
    #81     Mar 2, 2012
  2. I dunno, you have never stated it, but some of your friends are calling for treasonous activities. I just wanted to know. If the federalists call, you are going to put on the uniform and fight for the flag.
     
    #82     Mar 2, 2012
  3. WTF are you talking about? Would you elaborate please?
     
    #83     Mar 2, 2012
  4. Not to sound like McCarthy, but I got the obviously mistaken idea that you sided with people who hoped that change would come, "the old fashioned way". 377 said this. That is when I began to actively turn on him. We have a system, we are the greatest in the world democratically because of that system.

    I am relieved and thankful that you will support the government and structure of the United States if asked to do so.
     
    #84     Mar 2, 2012
  5. bighorn

    bighorn

    I gave you my definition of "racist". If you are too terrified to give yours, simply say so.
     
    #85     Mar 2, 2012
  6. Would you server under Obama if its a civil uprising to overthrow the government ?
     
    #86     Mar 2, 2012
  7. bighorn

    bighorn


    Typical Lib response - "I have nothing to support my weak position, so I'll just make a public ass of myself."
     
    #87     Mar 2, 2012
  8. Brass

    Brass

    Quite so.
     
    #88     Mar 2, 2012
  9. Your analysis is accurate if scholastic achievement , especially scholastic and financial achievement is the most important criteria. But what about how the two see science? While on evolution they are the same, on GW, Mitt's (convenient ?) skepticism shows he does not comprehend the issue very well.

    But I suspect what he "knows" is very dependent on which way the political winds blow. So can we trust such a shifty intelligence? That scares me more than staid stupidity.
     
    #89     Mar 2, 2012
  10. I believe that Mitt believes in GW and is only pandering to the right for the nomination

    http://articles.boston.com/2011-06-04/news/29685848_1_global-warming-climate-change-greenhouse-gases


    Romney reaffirms stance that global warming is real

    Bucking skeptics, he urges changes

    June 04, 2011|By Matt Viser, Globe Staff



    MANCHESTER, N.H. — In the first town hall of his freshly announced presidential campaign, Mitt Romney yesterday reaffirmed his view that global warming is occurring and that humans are contributing to it, a position that has been rejected in recent years by many Republicans as the issue has taken on a greater partisan tinge.

    After opening remarks in which Romney blamed President Obama’s policies for the new anemic hiring figures, the first questioner from the floor — a software developer from Hanover, N.H. — wanted to know the candidate’s position on climate change, an issue his opponents have generally avoided so far.

    “I don’t speak for the scientific community, of course,’’ Romney said. “But I believe the world’s getting warmer. I can’t prove that, but I believe based on what I read that the world is getting warmer. And number two, I believe that humans contribute to that … so I think it’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may well be significant contributors to the climate change and the global warming that you’re seeing.’’

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0DRBuQmEE0E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #90     Mar 2, 2012