Sheriff Joe To Vet Obama's Eligibility

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Feb 29, 2012.

  1. I have searched

    His BC has the State of Hawaii's certification seal,The State of Hawaii's sitting Republican Governor ,The State of Hawaii's health department directer and The United States House of Representatives all say President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii
     
    #131     Mar 4, 2012
  2. +1
     
    #132     Mar 4, 2012
  3. I would be willing to put money on the idea that most of the ET right here considers the governor of HI similar to Olympia Snowe, who 377 recently called a "cunt", the highest insult possible to a white woman, and to which, no one on the right objected to.

    It is clear what these fellows are about.
     
    #133     Mar 4, 2012
  4. pspr

    pspr

    It will take hell and high water to get the NBC issue to the Supreme Court while he is in office.

    But, for the first time, I'm now convinced that Obama was not even born in Hawaii given how overseas flight records of 1961 have been scrubbed from national archives and that he has put out a fake birth certificate.

    There is no other explanation for Obama's actions.
     
    #134     Mar 4, 2012
  5. It has made it to The Supreme Court...twice

    You have to be the most misinformed birther on ET







    Rhodes v. Macdonald

    In September 2009, Taitz, filed Rhodes v. MacDonald (Colonel Thomas MacDonald - Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, Georgia) on behalf of Captain Connie Rhodes, a U.S. Army physician, sought a restraining order to stop Rhodes' forthcoming deployment to Iraq. In the request for a restraining order, Taitz argued the order was illegal since Obama was illegally serving as President. On September 16, federal judge Clay D. Land (the same judge who heard Cook v. Good) rejected the motion and denounced it as frivolous.[50]

    Within hours of Land's decision, Taitz told the news site Talking Points Memo that she felt Land's refusal to hear her case was an act of treason.[51] Two days later, she filed a motion to stay Rhodes' deployment pending rehearing of the dismissal order. She repeated her treason allegations against Land and made several other intemperate statements, including claims that Land was aiding and abetting purported aspirations of "dictatorship" by Obama.[52] Land rejected the motion as frivolous and ordered her to show cause why she should not be fined $10,000 for abuse of judicial process.[53]

    Upon learning of Land's ruling, Taitz said she would appeal the sanction, declaring that Judge Land was "scared to go against the regime" of the "oppressive" Obama administration, and that the sanction was an attempt to "intimidate" her.[57] On March 15, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the sanctions against Taitz.[58] On August 9, 2011, the federal government filed an abstract of judgment, a document placing a lien in the amount of $20,000 plus interest on all her real property,[59] prompting Taitz to say, "I will pay the money, and I will continue fighting."[60] On January 10, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, to hear the case.









    Hollister v. Soetoro

    On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as "Barry Soetoro", the name given at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school). The suit was dismissed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The presiding judge, James Robertson, said the case was a waste of the court's time, calling Berg and another lawyer "agents provocateurs" and their local counsel, John Hemenway, "a foot soldier in their crusade." He ordered Hemenway to show cause why he should not pay the legal fees for Obama's attorney as a penalty for filing a complaint "for an improper purpose such as to harass".[35] The district court ultimately reprimanded Hemenway for his actions, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the dismissal of the case and Hemenway's reprimand.[21] On January 18, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, to hear the case.






    [​IMG]
     
    #135     Mar 4, 2012
  6. You don't understand,Maybe others from your side will help you understand


    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8rAqhdL1BUs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mBwMJO9-pG0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UNvU-uUVvrg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #136     Mar 4, 2012