Shariah Law in England?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Arnie Guitar, May 1, 2007.

  1. I do not know who told you that but even Muslims who proposed Shria laws in Canada declared that a civil court would trump theirs in some cases.

    Example, a wife who is being miss treated by her husband could always refer to the local authorities and courts to get her rights.

    Your argument that the Shria law will apply to non religious Muslims is ludicrous!

    It is only when both parties agree, BEFORE HAND, to use the Shria law as a reference.

    I want to see who will dare to impose a sharia court ruling on me if I did not recognize that court in the first place.


    For god sake guys! Do not come out swinging before having all your facts straight!

    You know why I am I opposed to the Shria laws? It is a law based on male chauvinism...Much like the Jewish courts!

    Now take this piece of information and run with it instead of building a case on missinformation.
     
    #61     May 2, 2007
  2. Ahhhhhhhh...Wrong!! My wife has a dual citizen! Guess what is the other one buddy!

    We, as I mentioned to you before, are tax paying citizens even though we live outside of Canada.

    Unlike you spying on myu own country and then fleeing to Israel to avoid prosecution.

    We did not spy on our country and sold information and technology to our enimes...Unlike you and your ilk.

    We did not defraud the system and milked the nation out of their money to build settlements on land that we stole.

    Israeli Arabs are the owners of this land you Khazara thief.

    It is you you fucking Polish, German, American, Romanian, English fucking Zionist who deserted his own people and stabbed them in the back and bombed their ships in the middle of the sea.

    It is you you fucking criminal Zionist who blew hotels full of your Previous countrymen.

    It is you who spied...Spied against your own country for the sake of your Terrorist entity called the Zionist state.
     
    #62     May 2, 2007
  3. Do you wanna bet Mr. Know it all?!
     
    #63     May 2, 2007
  4. SECRET courts imposing draconian Islamic justice are operating across Britain.

    Last night politicians and religious leaders expressed outrage that sharia law is gaining an increasing foothold in our society.

    The hardline Islamic law allows people to be stoned to death, beheaded or have their limbs amputated.

    Yesterday experts insisted the Government had already allowed elements of sharia law to be introduced. The Treasury has brought in measures including interest-free loans and mortgages which comply with the Islamic law.

    But it was also alleged unofficial criminal courts are meting out their own justice.

    The scandal was outlined on BBC Radio 4's Law in Action programme which uncovered evidence that Muslims are using their own laws here.

    Youth worker Aydarus Yusuf, 29, told how he helped convene an unofficial court which uses Somalian law.

    He said a hearing was held in Woolwich, South-east London, after a group of youths were arrested on suspicion of attacking another Somali teenager.

    The victim's family told police the matter would be settled out of court and the suspects were freed on bail.


    He insisted he is more bound by the law of his country of birth than British justice, adding: "Somalis, wherever we live in the world, have our own law."

    Dr Patrick Sookhdeo of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity said: "Sharia courts now operate in most larger cities, with different sectarian and ethnic groups operating their own courts that cater to their specific needs according to their tradition.

    "The Government has not been straight about this. It has it's own sharia advisers and it has already introduced measures that are compliant with sharia law.

    "Muslim communities are creating their own infrastructure based on sharia law. A Muslim community can now function within its own society on every level."

    "The drive to implement sharia in the UK, both within the Muslim community and the British legal system, must be seen as part of Islam's impetus to dominate all societies it finds itself in.""

    http://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-1E8Ekg03aaMYYxNw_23D?p=572
     
    #64     May 2, 2007
  5. A SHOCKING report today exposes the grip Islamic law now has on British society.

    Honour killings, polygamy, child marriages and mutilation are revealed in the study by Islam expert Dr Patrick Sookhdeo, director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity.

    The findings come after the Daily Express told yesterday how secret courts are meting out Islamic justice and creating a two-tier legal system.

    The report outlines areas where hardline sharia law conflicts with Britain's justice system and warns of attempts to include parts of Islamic law in British law.

    It says: "Since sharia has some regulations which relate to non-Muslims such changes in British law could impinge on non-Muslims too. They would affect individual human rights of freedom of choice and the religious freedoms of both Muslims and non-Muslims."

    The study highlights how suicide rates among young Asian women are more than three times the national average and that an estimated about 12 women die every year as a result of honour killings. The gruesome crimes are carried out after relatives decide women family members have brought shame on them.

    The report also reveals how Muslim girls are being forced into child marriages permitted under sharia law.

    http://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-1E8Ekg03aaMYYxNw_23D?p=572
     
    #65     May 2, 2007
  6. Sure. Low level dispute resolution is a traditional thing, and the concept of dialogue and mediation by religious figures is well intrenched in much arab culture.
    Trouble is , its still a fuedal approach, when the same person ruling on the fair adjistment of a donkey is also able to sanction, or direct shocking crimes as punishment for practically anything.

    Besides, so long as its written they have a moral obligation to take over the world and kill unbeleivers, freedom of religion is preposterous.
     
    #66     May 2, 2007
  7. Went and searched and looked. Didn't leave any stone unturned in an attempt to hold anything against the people he so hardly trying to demean in an attempt to push his very specific agenda.

    I'll give you an example for your tupid argument.

    Every practice not monitored by authorities takes momentum on its own. there are backward cultural practices, as the article above implied (Somali laws) but that in no mean the rule that is followed by the vaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaast majority of Muslims.

    Aside From Saudi Arabia, ALL...ALL...ALL...ALL Arab and Muslim states implement their own civil laws.

    If I happen to die in Jordan or Palestine tomorrow, my wife and family's affairs will be decided by a civil court and not a Shria court.

    And that is what you, my friend, will try your hardest to hide from the rest of the guys in here.

    Why you ask? You know why Zionist boy!

    Bottom line, as in any group, there are fringe groups who will try their darnest to push the envelope. It is what the populous, in this case, Muslim citizens of that country decide on.

    An example of that is one the you innocently forgot to mention which is the "halacha as found in the Shulchan Aruch" and their ruling on informing on other violating Jews to civil authorities and how to treat non Jews.

    Why don't you mention thes laws that are being practiced by many many of the Orthodox Jews of this country dddooo???
     
    #67     May 2, 2007
  8. We can argue endlessly about this. I can understand that religious muslims want their religious traditions respected and would rather have disputes settled in accordance with them than by a court system that has no relevance to them. It is equally clear to me that a society starts down a slippery slope indeed when it starts letting groups opt out of the judicial and legal structure that everyone else is required to be part of.

    There is one obvious solution. Stop allowing muslims to immigrate to western countries. Gradually send back the ones who are here on visas. Cease the much-abused practice of granting refugee status to those from countries who could not immigrate here legally. If muslims do not want to be part of western societies, and it is becoming abundantly clear they do not, why should we allow them to come here and inevitably create problems? Do we have to have riots like France or killings over cartoons and such before it becomes obvious?
     
    #68     May 3, 2007
  9. PLATER

    PLATER

    You may, born in Britain, recently residing in NZ.

    I was brought up in a town that has a large muslim community so i do know of them, believe or not i even went to school with a few. They're probably in pakistan now, training as we speak.

    The muslim community have never tried to intergrate into British society.
     
    #69     May 3, 2007
  10. How if he was a Muslim American form an Arab or African or Asian or Eastern European back ground, would you still wish that he leaves if he does not like to CONFORM with your Western ways??

    Would you still send the blacks that YOU YOURSEL forced to ghettoized through your hate and discrimination and who disapprove of your "WESTERN WAYS" back to Africa??
     
    #70     May 3, 2007