LOL...and here are the "HOPE AND CHANGE" ideas all you knuckle heads or should I say OBAMA FANS voted for. http://biggovernment.com/capitolcon...at-house-member-puts-the-squeeze-on-lobbyist/ I know, I know....Republicans do it to. Politican's in General are scumbags! Can't get any better than this smoking gun for the one of the Leadership of the Dem House...
This is like a telethon for "Obama's" kids. lmao. "If I had done my homework I would have called sooner," translation = you better make up for all the years I forgot to ask. She's probably looking for about 20 years worth. ps. I think her and Obama share the same barber.
Naive woman! Should have done the smart way by hiding behind Cigar Associations. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=203604
I know it's a voicemkail and all, but in DC, does releasing this recording violate some wire tap law they have?
Federal law allows recording of phone calls and other electronic communications with the consent of at least one party to the call. A majority of the states and territories have adopted wiretapping statutes based on the federal law, although most also have extended the law to cover in-person conversations. Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia permit individuals to record conversations to which they are a party without informing the other parties that they are doing so. These laws are referred to as âone-party consentâ statutes, and as long as you are a party to the conversation, it is legal for you to record it. (Nevada also has a one-party consent statute, but the state Supreme Court has interpreted it as an all-party rule.) http://www.rcfp.org/taping/