Serious Question

Discussion in 'Index Futures' started by Real Money, Aug 30, 2019.

  1. qlai

    qlai

    So you have given a thought to automating this but don't think it can be done? Sounds like best option even if performance might degrade.
     
    #41     Aug 30, 2019
  2. rb7

    rb7

    Anything can be automated.
    If you really cannot automated it, it means that you cannot reproduce it with clear instructions.
     
    #42     Aug 30, 2019
    tommcginnis likes this.
  3. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    Not true about "anything" even with clear instructions.

    Yet, some of the social media (e.g. twitter) algorithms being using by institutional trading firms is causing me to 2nd guess my opinions about not true for "anything". :D

    wrbtrader
     
    #43     Aug 30, 2019
  4. rb7

    rb7

    How about the Bilateral Symmetry Theorem?
    Or the Dihybrid Cross Theory?
    Or the Karyotype Law of Large Samples?
     
    #44     Aug 30, 2019
  5. rb7

    rb7

    If you can repeat why you are taking a decision, then it can be automated.
    If you cannot, think harder, unless you change your mind depending on your mood, and even in that case, if you can identify your mood...
     
    #45     Aug 30, 2019
  6. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    Please setup a Short signal in the any index futures to only Short when Trump tweets about tariffs from his bedroom when his advisors are not present to occur on any day the FED Chairman has a speech.

    I'm sure someone out there can do but most likely its not a trader nor someone working for a financial institution. :D

    wrbtrader
     
    #46     Aug 30, 2019
    tommcginnis likes this.
  7. Heteroskedasticity

    Thread has been reported for TOS language violations.. :p

     
    #47     Aug 30, 2019
    tommcginnis and BlueWaterSailor like this.
  8. I will have you know I identify as one. None of your perverted homeostasis stuff for me, thank you very much.
     
    #48     Aug 30, 2019
    tommcginnis likes this.
  9. tommcginnis

    tommcginnis

    I have been pounding this drum for at least the past year. "Good on ya!!"
     
    #49     Aug 30, 2019
  10. tommcginnis

    tommcginnis

    I once caused a court reporter to crack up a *very* serious (read: "haughty") hearing room one time when, in the course of a response under cross, I used the term heteroskedasticity. Now, the regulatory community is rather small, so the judges, lawyers, *Court*reporters*, primary staffers -- all know each other. And all knew this gal to be a serious, sturdy professional. (And she could swear like a sailor, too -- so you never gave her any guff. Big farm girl. In a dress. Amy[!!] was her name.)

    Well, the cross exam is going back and forth, back and forth -- like a verbal tennis match. I actually forget the subject, but it must've had something to do with forecasts, and errors were mentioned, and I described some part of my answer with "heteroskedasticity"....

    No sooner did I get the word out than Amy tilts her head to look at me and out comes a loud "HhhHUH??" And she was always SO calm and always SO professional, and she stops the place cold and it *erupts* with laughter. I'mmmmm cracking up just thinking about it.

    There were some chuckles (and a few groans) in that staid environment over the years, but none produced the raucous laughter of

    "...heteroskedasticity..."
    "HhhHUH??"

    :D:D:D:D
     
    #50     Aug 30, 2019