Nice try but now you are relying on the law to define reasonable and informed consent. Noteworthy by its absence from you argument is a your analysis of how many people may be allowed in a marriage. You are drawing lines just like people who defend the status quo. Your activist stance has no more legitimacy than than the legislature who defines marriage as between one man and one women.
I urge everyone to read this article: http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2006/06/the_gay_animal_kingdom.php Note that the researcher, Joan Roughgarden, is a transexual. I neither agree or disagree with this article as it is highly speculative, but at least it attempts to present a scientific basis for homosexuality in all animals. nitro
Yes, I do rely on the law to make definitions, and judges to evaluate those definitions as they apply to a case by case situation when necessary.... Yes, I don't care if 1 man marries 100 women. I pitty the fool....