Senate shoots down homophobe bill

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Jun 7, 2006.

  1. In z10's world you have to be in favor of everything otherwise you are a homophobe, racist, xenophobe or whatever new liberal word the left makes up.

    He is a commonsense phobe.

    He's drooling right now waiting to throw in his favorite phrase "ad hominem".
     
    #11     Jun 9, 2006
  2. Nonsense.

    Thre are gays who are opposed to gay marriage, and they certainly are not homophobes.

    Doh!

     
    #12     Jun 9, 2006
  3. 1. Homosexuality is not natural, much like eyeglasses, polyester, and birth control are not natural.
    2. Heterosexual marriages are valid because they produce children. Infertile couples and old people cannot get legally married because the world needs more children.
    3. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children because straight parents only raise straight children.
    4. Straight marriage will be less meaningful, since Britney Spears's 55-hour just-for-fun marriage was meaningful.
    5. Heterosexual marriage has been around for a long time, and it hasn't changed at all: women are property, Blacks can't marry Whites, and divorce is illegal.
    6. Gay marriage should be decided by the people, not the courts, because the majority-elected legislatures, not courts, have historically protected the rights of minorities.
    7. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are always imposed on the entire country. That's why we only have one religion in America.
    8. Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people makes you tall.
    9. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage license.
    10. Children can never succeed without both male and female role models at home. That's why single parents are forbidden to raise children.
    11. Gay marriage will change the foundation of society. Heterosexual marriage has been around for a long time, and we could never adapt to new social norms because we haven't adapted to cars or longer lifespans.
    12. Civil unions, providing most of the same benefits as marriage with a different name are better, because a "separate but equal" institution is always constitutional. Separate schools for African-Americans worked just as well as separate marriages will for gays & lesbians.
     
    #13     Jun 9, 2006
  4. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


     
    #14     Jun 9, 2006
  5. Ricter

    Ricter

    It is good for that, lol.
     
    #15     Jun 9, 2006
  6. Oooops, you did it again....

     
    #16     Jun 9, 2006
  7. jem

    jem

    form mirriam websters online dictionary

    1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage> b : the mutual relation of married persons : WEDLOCK c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage


    So zzz you say gays should be married.

    Now nambla types in Holland are saying and underage boy should be allowed to be united with older man.

    What is to stop you from crying out for marriage between a 40 year old man and a 12 year old boy. Or six 12 year old boys. Or a man and 12 women. Why are you not leading the charge against the bigotry against polygamists.

    Where is activism going to draw the line.
     
    #17     Jun 9, 2006
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    Rofl, you should put that in a macro.

    "Beetlebrow push key. Keys type for Beetlebrow. Beetlebrow pleased."
     
    #18     Jun 9, 2006
  9. Not saying gays "should" or should not be married. Not saying whites "should" marry whites only. Not saying "men" should marry women, etc.

    I'm saying human beings "should" be able to marry who they want, as long as they and their partner are capable of informed and reasonable consent...

    I stand in opposition to Nambla or any other organization that suggest adults have sexual relations with anyone that is not of an age where they cannot come to reasonable and informed consent.

    Same would be true for an adult male who seduces a retarded woman or man who has no real understanding of what he or she is doing.

    I don't believe children are capable of making a decision to have sex and/or marry, or have a relationship of that nature with either a fellow child or an adult.

     
    #19     Jun 9, 2006
  10. You lost again, I see...

     
    #20     Jun 9, 2006