Here's a link to the chart with the key support/resistance levels for today's trading which were formed on yesterday's 5-min. chart. I only use them until the price trades through a particular level. Then I use new highs and lows that are formed on the current day's 5 min. chart. I usually wait for a retracement swing of at least 15 points before I'll mark a new level. Also, the study that plots the support/resistance lines is an eSignal efs formula that I asked if they could create for me (Jason programmed it). It comes in very handy and will plot the same levels in multiple charts, so I can enter the levels in the study and apply them to the 1, 3 and 5 minute charts without having to put them all in individually. You can get it at the eSignal web site. Go to the efs library and do a search on "LinesLabels.efs" Description of LinesLabels.efs: Draws up to 30 horizontal lines at price levels specified by user through the "Edit Studies" option. Here are the support/resistance levels:
Here are some of the support/resistance levels for tomorrow, 8/25/03. The ones marked on the chart are from Friday. The levels not marked are similar 5-min. pivot levels from previous days.
4 Trades: 0 winners, 4 losers. Gross P&L: -18 pts. Net P&L: -22 pts. (-1 pt/rt for commissions) I didn't deduct for slippage because these were actual trades and slippage is already figured in (just 1 pt. slippage). Today sucked. The market just chopped around and whipsawed me on every trade. However, I followed the rules and avoided making one impulsive trade in particular that would have been a loser. Also, I was considering stopping trading after trade #3 because of the choppy market action, but I had another valid setup for trade #4 and I wanted to give it one more shot. Luckily, I only lost 1 pt. on that trade (due to slippage). Well, tomorrow is another day, and I want to continue with this method for a while to see if it will work. To be honest, I was more than a little skeptical that this would work at all when I started, but after spending some time gettting things dialed in, I was a little surprised that it seemed to be working as well as it was, so I decided to implement it in real time. Unfortunately, I've had methods that worked great when I was paper trading them, only to have them fail miserably once I started trading them for real. (I'm talking going from a 70%+ win rate to less than 20%). I don't know if it's because the market has already started to factor in whatever it is that I've discovered before I've even have a chance to trade it, or what. That's why I went right into trading this when it seemed to be working with the guidelines I have set up now. Also, I know that posting this publicly could have an effect on the outcome, but so far, the benefits of keeping this journal have outweighed any negatives. The main benefit I get is that I have to be accountable for following the rules, since they are publicly posted and if I make an impulse trade, I'll have to post it, which I don't want to do. It also forces me to do my homework and pay more attention to the details because I have to write everything down and think about things more when trying to explain them to others. #1 Retracement 9:44 a.m. -1@9305 9:47 a.m. +1@9309 (-4) #2 Range 9:47 a.m. +1@9309 9:52 a.m. -1@9302 (-7) I was considering stopping and reversing on this trade (with a retracement short), but it was right at support and market looked like it was starting to go sideways (i.e. support was holding). #3 Range 9:54 a.m. +1@9306 9:56 a.m. -1@9300 (-6) #3 Range 10:11 a.m. -1@9314 10:16 a.m. +1@9315 (-1)
If anyone has a method that made money I would like to see it, one reversal after another, no fun, no fun.
Here is the chart for yesterday's trades. I didn't get a chance to put notes on it but I marked the entries and exits that are posted in the summary.
3 Trades: 1 win, 1 loss, 1 scratch. Gross P&L: - 1 pt. Net P&L: -4 pts. #1 Retracement 9:37 a.m. +1@9293 9:43 a.m. -1@9294 (+1) #2 Retracement (mistake) 9:44 a.m. +1@9298 9:45 a.m. -1@9298 (0) This was a valid retracement signal based on the chart, but it was the second retracement in the trend and I had forgotton about the rule to only take the first retracement when I entered, so I exited at the market for a scratch. #3 Range 10:11 a.m. +1@9258 10:14 a.m. -1@9256 (-2) I was a little tentative taking this trade because the market was heading down fast, but it was a valid setup at support so I took it. However, once I had a little room in the trade, and a small pivot (sort of) was created by the 10:12 and 10:13 a.m. bars, I placed my stop below the low at 9260. My stop was taken out with 4 points of slippage, so I ended up losing 2 pts. instead of gaining 2 pts. on this trade. (No problem though - it was a good decision to tighten stop). There was also one trade I passed on - a range trade (short) at 10:01 a.m. that really took off and would have been good for about 50 points, but I didn't take it because a report just came out at 10:00 and the market got very volatile. Due to this, my initial risk would have been 17 pts. which was a little much for me. I was waiting for another bar to form that I could enter on with a little less risk, but the market ran before I could get in. I'm dissapointed I missed it, but it was a discretionary call and in hindsight, I still think it was the right decision. (I also think I may still be a little gun-shy from yesterday's losses).
Here is the chart for today's trades. I've stopped putting the prices and pts. per trade in there because it's redundant - all of that info is already in the daily summary.
4 Trades: 0 winners, 4 losers Gross P&L: -20 pts. Net P&L: -24 pts. #1 Range 9:38 -1 @ 9327 9:40 +1 @ 9329 (-2) #2 Retracement 9:40 a.m. +1 @ 9329 9:46 a.m. â1 @ 9327 (-1) #3 Range 9:58 a.m. +1 @ 9319 10:00 a.m. â1 @ 9313 (-6) I started to get mad after this trade. #4 Range 10:01 a.m. +1 @ 9318 10:07 a.m. â1 @ 9307 (-11) I got really mad after this trade. I passed on a retracement setup (short) at 9:54 a.m. because the entry was at 9322 and support was at 9314 â 8 pts. away. Had I taken the trade and followed the rules, I would have been stopped out at 9319 for a profit of +3 pts. (bfd). This is really starting to suck now. This is what always happens â I take an idea that appears to be working (at least fairly well) and then when I try to apply it for real, it goes to shit. One criticism that could be made is that I didnât spend enough time backtesting and forward testing, but in the past, I once thoroughly tested a system in real time with 30+ trades over a period of a month and had a 75% win rate. When I traded the system strictly by the rules I had just finished testing, I had 10 losers in a row. TEN! It seems that this is happening again. Iâm actually considering doing the opposite (switching buys and sells) Iâm so disgusted. Now I have to decide whether to keep trading or just paper trade or throw in the towel. The question is âHow long do you trade a losing system before youâre convinced it doesnât work?
Well, that's a thought, but to tell the truth, I don't think it will help. The method that I described in my prior post that was making 75% winners until implementing it was very similar to the retracement setup. Sure, I'll give it a try, what the heck. It's only money.