Secularist Europe Silences Pro-Lifers and Creationists From the desk of Paul Belien on Sat, 2007-06-23 18:53 Last week, a German court sentenced a 55-year old Lutheran pastor to one year in jail for âVolksverhetzungâ (incitement of the people) because he compared the killing of the unborn in contemporary Germany to the holocaust. Next week, the Council of Europe is going to vote on a resolution imposing Darwinism as Europeâs official ideology. The European governments are asked to fight the expression of creationist opinions, such as young earth and intelligent design theories. According to the Council of Europe these theories are âundemocraticâ and âa threat to human rights.â Without legalized abortion the number of German children would increase annually by at least 150,000 â which is the number of legal abortions in birth dearth Germany. Pastor Johannes Lerle compared the killing of the unborn to the killing of the Jews in Auschwitz during the Second World War. On 14 June, a court in Erlangen ruled that, in doing so, the pastor had âincited the peopleâ because his statement was a denial of the holocaust of the Jews in Nazi-Germany. Hence, Herr Lerle was sentenced to one year in jail. Earlier, he had already spent eight months in jail for calling abortionists âprofessional killersâ â an allegation which the court ruled to be slanderous because, according to the court, the unborn are not humans. Other German courts convicted pro-lifers for saying that âin abortion clinics, life unworthy of living is being killed,â because this terminology evoked Hitlerâs euthanasia program, which used the same language. In 2005, a German pro-lifer, GÃ¼nter Annen, was sentenced to 50 days in jail for saying âStop unjust [rechtswidrige] abortions in [medical] practice,â because, according to the court, the expression âunjustâ is understood by laymen as meaning illegal, which abortions are not. Volksverhetzung is a crime which the Nazis often invoked against their enemies and which contemporary Germany also uses to intimidate homeschoolers. Soon, the German authorities will be able to use the same charge against people who question Darwinâs evolution theory. Indeed, next Tuesday, the Council of Europe (CoE), Europeâs main human-rights body, will vote on a proposal which advocates the fight against creationism, âyoung earthâ and âintelligent designâ in its 47 member states. According to a report of the CoEâs Parliamentary Assembly, creationists are dangerous âreligious fundamentalistsâ who propagate âforms of religious extremismâ and âcould become a threat to human rights.â The report adds that the acceptance of the science of evolutionism âis crucial to the future of our societies and our democracies.â âCreationism, born of the denial of the evolution of species through natural selection, was for a long time an almost exclusively American phenomenon,â the report says. âToday creationist theories are tending to find their way into Europe and their spread is affecting quite a few Council of Europe member states. This is liable to encourage the development of all manner of fundamentalism and extremism, synonymous with attacks of utmost virulence on human rights. The total rejection of science is definitely one of the most serious threats to human rights and civic rights. The war on the theory of evolution and on its proponents most often originates in forms of religious extremism which are closely allied to extreme right-wing political movements. The creationist movements possess real political power. The fact of the matter, and this has been exposed on several occasions, is that the advocates of strict creationism are out to replace democracy by theocracy. If we are not careful, the values that are the very essence of the Council of Europe will be under direct threat from creationist fundamentalists.â According to the CoE report, America and Australia are already on their way towards becoming such undemocratic theocracies where human and civic rights are endangered. Creationism is âwell-developed in the English-speaking countries, especially the United States and Australia,â the report states. âWhile most curricula in Europe today unashamedly teach evolution as a recognised scientific theory, the same does not apply to the United States. In July 2005, the Pew Research Center conducted a poll that showed that 64% of Americans favoured the teaching of intelligent design alongside the theory of evolution and that 38% would support the total abandonment of the teaching of evolution in publicly owned schools. The American President George W. Bush supports the principle of teaching both intelligent design and the theory of evolution. At the moment, 20 of the 50 American states are facing potential adjustments of their school curricula in favour of intelligent design. Many people think that this phenomenon only affects the United States and that, even if it is not possible to be indifferent to what is happening on the other side of the Atlantic, it is not the Council of Europeâs role to deal with this issue. That, however, is not the case. On the contrary, it would seem crucial for us to take the appropriate precautions in our 47 member states.â Though one may disagree with people who take the Book of Genesis literally (believing that God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh), surely secularist political organizations telling people what they may or may not believe, constitute a far greater threat to human rights than religious institutions telling their faithful how to vote. In the voting booth people are free to do what they like, whilst in contemporary Europe people are no longer free to publicly voice their own, deeply felt opinions in public. In Germany, believing abortion to be as murderous as the holocaust is a crime, and educating your own children is a crime too. In France, saying that âhomosexual behaviour endangers the survival of humanityâ is a crime, and so is the distribution of pork soup to the poor. In Belgium, speaking out against immigration is a crime. In the latest issue of the Dutch conservative magazine Bitter Lemon the Dutch author Erik van Goor writes that European courts are silencing conservative and orthodox citizens. Freedom of speech no longer exist, says van Goor. âWhile many in the West still idolize the second-hand fighters for free speech, such as [Ayaan] Hirsi Ali and Theo van Gogh, the true victims of curtailment are deliberately kept under wraps. Hirsi Ali, [Pim] Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh were not curtailed by the state or by court, Johannes Lerle is. The former voiced mere opinions â expressions of a public opinion which one may or may not value or believe. The latter â Dr Lerle â shows that what is at stake is not merely opinions, but a moral order which is being questioned; a reality of life and death which is at risk.â Hirsi Ali, Fortuyn and van Gogh did not defend Europeâs traditional Christian moral order. People such as Johannes Lerle and Christian Vanneste, the French parliamentarian who was convicted for âhomophobia,â do. The latter are being persecuted by Western Europeâs political regimes â a phenomenon which is ignored completely by the Western mainstream media, who participate in the persecution. Update A quote from Reuters, 25 June 2007: Europeâs main human rights body on Monday cancelled a scheduled vote on banning creationist and intelligent design views from school science classes, saying the proposed resolution was one-sided. Guy Lengagne, the French Socialist member of the Assembly who drew up the report, protested after the Parliamentary Assembly voted to call off the debate and vote, and to send the report back to committee for further study. Deputies said the motion by the Christian Democratic group of parliamentarians also won support from east European deputies, who recalled that Darwinian evolution was a favorite theory of their former communist rulers.