SEC may Reinstate Uptick Rule

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by listedguru, Feb 23, 2009.

  1. Ding! Ding! Ding!
    We have a WINNER!!!
    :D
     
    #21     Feb 23, 2009
  2. bevo96

    bevo96

    How is this a winner? It doesn't matter about the biased sample, or the low volatility sampling period. The bottom line is the uptick rule doesnt apply to the big firms that trade 70-80% (one sided) of the market volume every day...it didnt when the SHO pilot was being run, it didn't before the pilot was run, and it won't if we go back to an uptick environment.
     
    #22     Feb 23, 2009
  3. I think it may be too little too late. Stocks like AIG, GM, and C have just about run out of ticks.
     
    #23     Feb 23, 2009
  4. This is from briefing today:

    12:28 Fed Chairman Bernanke says if the uptick rule had been in effect it might have had some benefit; says the SEC is looking at that, and will have to make a determination of whether it would be beneficial to restore it

    Bernanke says traditional literature doesn't seem to find much impact of the uptick rule, but in the recent market environment, it might have had some benefit.

    -Guru
     
    #24     Feb 25, 2009
  5. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    Its the stupidest thing ever ( to re-instate the uptick rule). Markets today are not conrtolled by the retail traders but the institutions and they do not day trade ( most hedge funds trend trade) thus a penny up or 10 pennies up makes no difference. This is sheer ignorance by the politicians and people who know nothing about the market mechanics.
     
    #25     Feb 25, 2009
  6. Cox was a willing participant for all we know, he was worthless either way you look at him and so is the SEC. At least now they have someone with a brain or who isn't bought out by some groups who love to short the market to death.
     
    #26     Feb 25, 2009
  7. I think it's funny to see so many on ET complaining about this. It shows how many have not been in the game for over a year.

    Any trader who traded with and without the uptick rule would be smiling at this. Except the automated systems traders.

    All those extensive arguments & studies are hilarious. Bunch of worthless mumbo jumbo. Uptick rule is an effiency to be exploited, nothing more.
     
    #27     Feb 25, 2009
  8. Feb. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said there may be a benefit in resurrecting a rule that restricts short-selling stocks when share prices are falling amid the current bear market.

    “In the kind of environment we have seen more recently” the so-called uptick rule “might have had some benefit,” Bernanke said in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee today. The rule, scrapped by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2007, barred investors from betting against a stock until it sells at a higher price than the preceding trade.
     
    #28     Feb 25, 2009
  9. tradersboredom

    tradersboredom Guest

    with uptick rule it's very difficult to short stocks or sell stocks. most people who sell stocks hit the bid if they own shares.

    if shorts can' short the market there is no incentive to crash the market. a good shorter can crash any stock or market.


     
    #29     Feb 25, 2009
  10. Notice the lingo? "Betting" against a stock. That's what the outside world thinks of us. And it's going to get a whole lot worse. The Wall St. Titans did this to us.

    I said it here a long time ago. The regulation coming will choke a horse. All because no one would step up and help us how many years ago. If we could have just had the SEC enforce regulations, we could have stopped this train wreck. But the payoffs were too good.
     
    #30     Feb 25, 2009