2. Now draw all the variations on step 1. and do it in an organized manner I made several messes doing Step 2 It was kinda pain to get organized Finally on paint i did 5 by 5 as time saver I feel so dumb at times.. not like planting corn
thanks for this follow up. you have the expressions for each crital part of pair relationship. Fine job. You have also used the convention mentioned in step 1 of post 4. This, quite nicely, brings up the coding part of making an ATS for SCT expressions for each end and be combined into a "function" of the whole relationship of the pair. To do this a simple addition is made. you use ( ) around each expression and "AND" them together. so who invented this approach Carnap did and it is called logic theory So now we wll be using logic to learn. All learning is deductive and induction is not allowed. so now you can read A. Lo of MIT in the light of an inductive process that is invalid/
edwina. wow you are same as redneck in post # 9. I see a differently oriented solution. RN is horizontally oriented (congrats to him) and you have tradtional vertical orientation of CW type potential trader. Go on to step 3 dont save up anwers and post a group in future because it is better to have a chain of conversations In the past several matrices have been posted some were 4x4's and so on for any given bar volatility there is a square matrices
Thanks for reply, I've tried "always in methods" in the past intra day with market orders and just get chopped to death essentially giving whoever was on the other side using limits a good trade and my broker comish. I used a Darvas style method. buying at the breakout of the box, selling breakdowns of the box. Now I essentially do the opposite with limits intraday and that works way better for me. Kind of like market making in a range. Contrary, On larger timeframes where commission and spread aren't an issue (daily/weekly charts) the darvas box breakouts work for me . (rectangles) as well as the other "CW " patterns I mentioned. So are you the guy using limits intraday or market orders? Are you recommending the beginner here use limits or market orders for this method you are teaching?
Okay, I added the lateral to the chart and did my best with the algebraic expressions. I was not sure exactly how to express the lateral. I know there are more intricacies one a lateral is established--like the low of bar.0 can be lower as long as it closes inside the lateral. Is that to be included in the expression as well? I drew the "bounds" of a lateral. I also just went ahead and labeled the price cases. Who is A. Lo of MIT? Is there something I should read for clarification?
Tahnks for introducing the levels of coding (using C++). some coding is a reference look up type and other coding is process in real time coding. the reference coding for the system of operation of the markets comes in just a few look up tables. we will have a look up for price, for volume, for end effects, for making money (2). and for compartmentalizing the End effects into ten subsets. all of this is just a little larger than the alphabet in terms of annotation symbols. so now we have the boundaries of the system in terms of knowledge reference system tables We will build mind as simple computer with "perception" that operates faster than the markets operate. so we will move to "anticipation" oreintation So we are seeing many and diverse contributions that
Yes the lateral is a more complex internal market interlude. we will build minds to be able to express it in logic using a RDBMS approach. This is where CW has never gone. CW has a risk and betting orientaion through inductive reasoning. Science does not follow this procedure. We will see just where a complete algorithm comes from and why and how the complete HS required a dictate PM. (See Keynes) Hang on for a few days.
THE CW which uses risk and bettingin the OODA routine context favors placing bets with limit orderwhich function in a FIFO manner and which become market orders at end of FIFO line. Risk comes from not having a complete system of the market operations. As you are seeing we are dealing with market info mation as found in a mental computer that always "knows it knows" with certainty. So we know to develop a complete system using deduction to complete the system WE use MADA as a certainty based routine All thrend segments have three parts: two ends and a middle ends are moments and middles span time in an Order Of Events all of this is rejected by the CW belief system based upon OOda betting and risk. too bad for those folloers
3. in some manner determine how many unilateral parts a bar may be broken into. Here are the 3 kinds i found am a little messy but it is three kinds i know now
this is correct leg, 2 leg and three leg we can use yours and RN's 5x5 to circle the three kinds here is the drill ; open in paint get ellpses or cicles on paint use blue ciclres to do 1 legs there are two use red circles to do the two legs ones; there are 12. leave rest alone; most are three legged