SCOTUS rules in favor of Hobby Lobby, religious freedom

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wallet, Jun 30, 2014.

  1. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    Not in it's current form. It's more flawed than you are. Wanna deal with facts?

    Explain why slobs (who choose to live unhealthy lives) pay the same rate as those who are healthy, exercise and do all the right things?

    explain why Odumbo allows high deductible policies only to the young? Isn't that discrimination? Ohh, I forgot ... he wants to help the masses (i.e. 2/3 of the country who are overweight and obese). he wants to discriminate against the healthy, fit people. Yeah, that makes sense. Once again, make those who are successful pay for the losers.

    Is that the same with auto insurance? A crappy, high risk driver pays the same as a safe driver? Nope ......

    Same with other forms of insurance .....

    You have no legs to stand on ...................
     
    #11     Jun 30, 2014
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    Who didn't think it would be modified in its first years? All legislation of this scope is subject to revision. Probably for decades to come. I know Canada is still modifying its own system, to deal with changing demographics.

    Obamacare will outlive you.
     
    #12     Jun 30, 2014
  3. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    Obamacare is an incredibly flawed form of insurance. The fact it is law is reprehensible. One size does not fit all and NEVER will. Do not force people to pay for a product they cannot use. What next? Odumbo mandating we all have to buy a certain vehicle? And some will pay sticker price and others get 90% subsidies? I'm no genius but Odumbo cannot have an IQ over 100.
     
    #13     Jun 30, 2014
  4. War on women! War on women! Come on rectum, shriek "war on women" like the lying shill you are.
     
    #14     Jun 30, 2014
  5. I want libturds to pay for my ammunition.
     
    #15     Jun 30, 2014
  6. Yannis

    Yannis

    From IMAO.us: Hobby Lobby Decision

    "Yay. A small majority of the Supreme Court still believes in the principle which was the entire point of founding this nation.

    “If women have to pay for their own abortifacients, we might as well just give up being a nation.” -the left right now

    “Hobby Lobby is against birth control.” -moron who doesn’t actually care enough about the issue to get the facts straight but likes yelling

    OUT: “Government stay out of the bedroom.”
    IN: “Hobby Lobby, get in this bedroom and bring me an abortifacient!”

    If you want the government and corporations to stay our of your personal areas, PAY FOR THINGS YOURSELF!

    Can’t we put all our disagreements aside and unite as a country to be bored by soccer?

    “We’ll have no freedoms left if we can’t force people to do things!”

    “WOMEN ARE BEING DENIED BIRTH CONTROL!!!”
    “There’s a Walgreens right over there and it’s open.”

    Are people who keep acting like Hobby Lobby is against birth control in general misinformed or dishonest? Facts get in way of LOUD YELLING!

    Don’t you support a woman’s right to choose what someone else should provide for her?

    Many seem confused on the difference between “freedom” and “free stuff” which are not at all related.

    My take on how the Hobby Lobby decision affects you: Not at all. Unless you like being outraged on Twitter.

    That there’s much disagreement over whether the Hobby Lobby decision is for or against freedom shows we have a big problem in this country.

    What is or isn’t freedom shouldn’t be debatable. Just ask which side wanted government force to be used to make someone do something.

    If you’re against the Hobby Lobby decision, you’re not for freedom. You’re saying easy access to abortifacients trumps freedom.

    It seems like President Obama would save a lot of time if he stuck to just doing things the Constitution says he’s allowed to do.

    The easiest way to tell if someone overreacting to the Hobby Lobby decision is if they’re acting like it has any actual effect on them.

    Guy on Twitter telling me case was all scheme by Hobby Lobby to increase investments in birth control they do cover. Pay off to Alito?..."

    :):):)
     
    #16     Jul 1, 2014
  7. As you point out so clearly, the left must lie to keep the issue alive. Hillary had to look straight at her audience and lie. Every talking head on the leftist news stations had to lie today. So we are left to conclude one of two things. Either they choose to remain willfully ignorant, or they are stupid beyond comprehension. Which is it lefties and why? Why do you choose to remain willfully ignorant? I mean, that has to be it as it's impossible to know you can walk into any drug store in the country and buy contraceptives and at the same time claim you're being denied access to said contraceptives. I mean, you just can't be that f'n stupid. It would be like someone saying they're being denied the opportunity to buy a hamburger while sitting in McDonalds eating a hamburger.
    Now just admit it. You're not mad because you can't buy your "hamburger". Obviously you can. You're mad because you have to pay for it.

     
    #17     Jul 1, 2014
  8. Good to see our "supreme" court is making way for superstition, ignorance and delusion to affect our national policy. Way to go SCOTUS !

    And what a surprise, none on the majority have a uterus.
     
    #18     Jul 1, 2014
  9. Yes, it is a tragic event akin to Jim Crow so I hear. Imagine the horror of having to pay for your own contraceptive choices. It's inhuman for christs sake.
     
    #19     Jul 1, 2014
  10. Max E.

    Max E.

    Good thing futurecurrents doesnt have to worry about he or his gay brother getting pregnant.
     
    #20     Jul 1, 2014