Scientists...Got it wrong again!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by peilthetraveler, May 29, 2009.

  1. Are you speaking of Zoolander ? :cool:
     
    #161     Jun 7, 2009
  2. i don't know who that is? i don't watch many movies :confused:
     
    #162     Jun 7, 2009
  3. Time implies a sequence, but time is relative. The entire "before/after" may mean nothing. What does time mean in 5, 6,...X dimensions?
     
    #163     Jun 7, 2009
  4. we are lucky that stu posts here.

    my advice is to talk less and listen more to stu.

    he has it going on!
     
    #164     Jun 7, 2009

  5. OK, Zoolander does not ring a bell.........

    How about the court case Goose v. Gander ? :)
     
    #165     Jun 7, 2009
  6. does any of this provide proof of your God/ if so, i am your humble servent :D

    there is no man that i canot learn from
     
    #166     Jun 7, 2009
  7. That is wisdom in a nut shell.......
     
    #167     Jun 7, 2009
  8. thought you'd like that, morons do :D
     
    #168     Jun 7, 2009
  9. Hold on a second there, fella...

    Leave us distinguish between "existing in possibility" and "possible existence" (potential).

    The former presupposes existence; the latter presupposes non-existence.

    Thank GOD I dropped in to straighten this mess out. Amen.
     
    #169     Jun 7, 2009
  10. When you guys can tell me whether or not Time can exist in the absence of all other things I'll get back to you with the Final Answer to the Big Question.
     
    #170     Jun 7, 2009