Scientists: Climate change is real

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, May 17, 2013.

  1. Yeah really.


    And how bout that singed toe guy. He doesn't believe in AGW so he's not going to look at any evidence that may counter his opinion. Classic right wing ignorant, dogmatic narrow-mindedness on display right there. They would rather be wrong than proved wrong. Such fragile egos they must have.
     
    #11     May 17, 2013
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Too bad for me I'll miss that. I figure I'll be dead by then.
     
    #12     May 17, 2013
  3. pspr

    pspr

    #13     May 17, 2013
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    I see peil's argument as a variation of jem's: Historically, fire lags lightning. Therefore Man cannot cause heat.
     
    #14     May 17, 2013
  5. pspr

    pspr

    More stupidity from our resident idiot.
     
    #15     May 17, 2013
  6. VVV1234

    VVV1234

    Nothing is wrong with the premise, it is the conclusion that makes for a faultily constructed syllogism. Here is the logically correct construction of a syllogism using your premise:

    I observed myself 20,000 times over the course of my life, and each time I did this, I didnt die. Therefore I can conclude with a high degree of certainty that the act of self observation cannot cause my death

    (Although he act of a third party -such as a partner - observing you every day for while might induce his or her suicide.)
     
    #16     May 18, 2013
  7. jem

    jem

    ricter is despise it when you leftist mis state our arguments on purpose. here is my argument...

    for about a year now you are routinely writing like an asshole so with a reasonable degree of certainty you must be an asshole.

    that is my argument.

    ---
    My real argument is that you have not shown CO2 to cause warming on earth... ever, with any science or observation.

    The observations show CO2 lags temperature.

    Therefore there is no way you can assert show man made CO2 causes warming on earth.

    and if you were really logical you would understand..

    if fire always lags lighting... (as co2 has always lagged temps) you would need some (proof) science to show fire causes lighting.

    obviously you are too leftist to actually discuss the science or even show integrity on this issue.




     
    #17     May 18, 2013
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    No, I would need to prove that Man also can cause fire.
     
    #18     May 18, 2013
  9. There certainly IS proof that increasing CO2 leads to increasing temperatures. Not to mention a logical presumption based upon our knowledge of how CO2 in the atmosphere works.

    But asking the moron deniers to use logic is too much to ask for.
     
    #19     May 18, 2013
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    NOPE!
     
    #20     May 18, 2013