Scientific Question

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by nitro, Nov 28, 2008.

  1. nitro

    nitro

    "I've got a couple of those Gossard Wonderbras. They are so brilliant, I swear, even I get cleavage with them." - Kate Moss, 1994, New York Times Magazine
     
    #31     Nov 28, 2008
  2. bronks

    bronks

    :D
     
    #32     Nov 28, 2008
  3. how do you know women even had breasts 10,000 years ago?

    do we have fossilized breasts on record?



    the fact may be that women today have the biggest breats in all of human history, which would simaltaneously prove and disprove your hypothesis.

    and it could also be that males have the largest wieners in all human history ...


    so, perhaps a couple of additional things to be thankful for
     
    #33     Nov 28, 2008
  4. thedewar

    thedewar

    look up over 65 porn if you wanna see some fossilized breasts
     
    #34     Nov 29, 2008
  5. Yes, very much agreed. The waist-to-behind relationship is of universal appeal, more so than breast size. Also, a well-formed and rounded behind points to good posture and well-formed shoulders. Stated differently, when a woman's behind is just right, everything else falls into place. In all the right places.

    And while on the topic of breasts, I think it is a mistake for women to get breast implants for anything other than reconstructive surgery, if that. If a woman has average breasts, then she does not need implants. And if she has smaller than average breasts, then making them meaningfully larger will make them look unnatural, because the valley between her breasts will be too large and the appearance will be incongruous. Nothing, nothing, nothing is better than natural, for the eyes and for the other senses.
     
    #35     Nov 29, 2008
  6. thedewar

    thedewar

    so natural breats are much better for smell taste and sound as well?
     
    #36     Nov 29, 2008
  7. Tums

    Tums

  8. nitro

    nitro

    You would probably like these:

    http://hotfemaletennisplayers.blogspot.com/

    Strange, but I find only two women in that set "hot", except a young Martina Hingis, and Maria Sharapova if she didn't tower over me.

    Martina used to look feminine:

    http://www.yardbarker.com/m/2371/xl/flatusyahu_martina_hingis_cocaine_scandal_copy.jpg

    Now she looks like she is way too muscular. That kind of athletic turns me off in a woman. However, womens sports is becoming serious business, and stronger and greater stamina equates to $.



     
    #38     Nov 29, 2008
  9. I was thinking more along the lines of common sense and the sense of touch. Apparently, you see things somewhat differently.
     
    #39     Nov 30, 2008
  10. Well, there is athletic with nicely toned muscles, and then there is bodybuilding muscular which looks grotesque on a woman. I have actually seen a few at the gym I previously frequented. They looked like men, even in the face. And the pronounced trapezius muscles were a dead giveaway that they were on 'roids.

    Speaking of anabolic steroids and their equivalent, I have noticed that a lot of show business people have been 'roiding up. I just saw the latest Bond film last night and can tell you I would readily bet 5 figures that the new Bond guy used them. Thankfully, the female lead did not.
     
    #40     Nov 30, 2008