Oh i see. My bad. It was vague and not comprehensible because you were just describing symptoms of Trump Derangement Syndrome, which affects The Islamic Offensive ("Hamas"), just as much as it affects local Democrats. It makes sense now. Democratic judges own our bureaucracy, and the bureaucracy is supreme to the "political appointments" of our elected officials. Also, The Islamic Offensive ("Hamas") owns Gaza, from which forward base (forward from the Muslim Brotherhood bases in Egyption) they are entitled to initiate surprise attacks by highly trained and propagandized fighters every few years, whenever they are not firing rockets almost daily, for years, on random Israeli targets.
This is what it comes down to, right now. Notice what is probably the true motivation for The Islamic Offensive (located, for the time being, in Gaza) for all of this toying with the ceasefire agreement: Probably Tehran has told the asses of Ham, to toy with Trump, after learning that Trump intends to build a tower for SpaceX rockets to land in Gaza.
Israel believes the only way for peace is to simply get rid of the problem and trump privately offered a solution which he expressed out loud. He has thought of a lot of solutions..but this is most likely his final solution.
Israel has withdrawn from the central corridor, as well as the Philidelphi corridor and the Rapha crossing is open to whomever, or whatever the Egyption want to cross. Apparently even the Palestinian Authority is in the Philidelphi corridor. And, Israel has withdrawn to the perimeter of Gaza, with a buffer zone inside Gaza that no one is allowed to cross. This is all per the ceasefire agreement. So i don't know what you mean. Now, since the Asses of Ham have made noises about not releasing any more, Israel is now reconstituting at the perimeter, reversing holidays for the soldiers. This reconstitution is also permissible in the ceasefire. They can have as many or few there as they want. Some people have proposed that continued conflict start costing the Asses of Ham territory, like 5 kilometers per hour, or 5% per unreturned hostage. That's not known policy yet. As it stands, it is actually unclear how many hostages Israel is expecting this coming Saturday, before high noon. At a minimum is three. They might also expect nine, which is the whole number remaining to be expected in "Phase One". The non-clarity of how many are expected Saturday might be on purpose. Trump has been clear, but Bibi has been a little vague, even though he sounded like he was agreeing with President Trump. He has only said, "The hostages..."
Israel is a deeply divided electorate (country) with a thin small majority swinging, like a pendulum, the same way the US is swinging in this election cycle. Arguably, this deep division was one factor motivating the Asses of Ham to attempt to start a war that cannot be won on a normal military battlefield. So i don't, and i don't think you know what they believe either. The Knesset, or the Cabinet, is going to do what they do, for the remaining time of Bibis term, which i understand is at least two more years, unless their judicial system manages to hamstring him. The Israeli judicial is very much like our own, only worse, in that activist judges have been grabbing more and more power over the years, functioning, almost defacto, as the congressional branch in the US functions, nearly eclipsing the Knesset. Bibis attempt to claw back some of this power is what has led to trumped up charges being brought against him as they try to take him out, like the executive branch in the US tried to take out Trump...through lawfare. This is part of the division that went into the Asses of Ham's calculus as to when was the best opportunity to launch a surprise attack. I would not blame the Knesset one bit if they finally resolved that the only way to make peace is to remove all agitators and activists from their Judea/Samaria regions, as well that part of Southern Israel called "Gaza". Not just terrorist militants, but also agitators and activists. I recon only about 20% of all Arabs currently occupying Israeli territory could possibly live in peace within the borders of Israel. The rest need to be invited to leave in no uncertain terms. Later on, there could be redress for a more complete vetting process to gradually allow some to return. But until everyone can be vetted more thoroughly, they may all have to be asked to leave temporarily. This will probably happen with Gazan first, and as that progresses smoothly, a similar operation may need to happen in the remaining Israeli territories that Jordan, Syria, and Egypt lost in their '48, '67 and '73 Islamic Offensives toward a pan-Arab supremacist supremacy over the entire post British Mandate areas (basically they tried to re-establish the southern portion of the Ottoman Caliphate despite the dispositive determinations of WW1).
The area in yellow (top) and red (bottom) were actually designated to go to a returning Jewish diaspora, and "Arabia" was to be awared to some sort of tribal Shiek for helping the British bring down the remains of the old Ottoman Empire, who took the wrong side of history during WW1. But Arabia was raided, invaded and conquered by another tribe, led by their own Shiek, Ibn Saud, booting out the tribe that the British wanted to award (for their services during WW1). So instead the Brits carved a big swath out of the area designated for the returning Jewish diaspora and gave it to a Shiek which was then titled a "King", perhaps to model its government after the British Monarchy. That King's grandson just left the White House, and last i heard, is still proposing a "two-state solution" for the local Arabs his grandfather incorporated into "Trans-Jordan" between '48-'67, with the aim of taking the entire region from the river (Jordan) to the sea (Mediterranean) . But what you are looking at here is the two state solution that the British gave the UN when it abandoned it's mandate back to its granting authority, which was originally the League of Nations, which later became the United Nations. In exiting its mandate to create a place for the returning Jewish diaspora, Brittain named an irreconcilable difference that they could not bridge. The Jews wanted a state, while the Arabs decided, incited by the "Grand Mufti of Jerusalem" (Yassar Arafats ancestor), that they mainly do not want the Jews to have any state at all, and that the entire region would be governed by Islamic Arabs, in an effort to perpetuate, or reconstitute some kind of post Ottoman caliphate over the entire middle east. In other words, the Islamic terror campaign, which includes a smear campaign, has never been about a two-state solution. The periphery of Israel's borders, ever since they accepted a UN Resolution for their own state (in '48) have ever since been, defacto, forward bases (a military term) for the reconquest of territory that were previously gained under the Mohammed Mandate dating back to 632, and which reached a zenith under the late Ottoman Empire. As a matter of religion, pan-Arabs, fired up by the perennial prospects of divinely sanctioned sequestering of booty, despise to lose even an inch of ground that was ever gained through centuries of colonialism via the sword. For all we know they are planning to take back Spain, rename it Andalusia, grab as much booty as a man can handle, and appear to be halfway there, politically, now.
Nice wall of words. In conclusion, Zionists just want the land. Their kooky ancient scrolls say a FSM told them it's theirs.