San Fran Mayor should be arrested

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by sputdr, Apr 7, 2006.

  1. or the feds at the very least should deny all federal funding for that country.

    Mayor: City would ignore legislation if it were to pass
    PDF | Email
    Justin Jouvenal, The Examiner
    Apr 7, 2006 9:00 AM (7 hrs ago)

    SAN FRANCISCO - Mayor Gavin Newsom said Thursday that The City will not comply with any federal legislation that criminalizes efforts to help illegal immigrants.


    The mayor also denounced a bipartisan congressional proposal that would beef up border security and allow as many as 12 million illegal immigrants to gain legal status.

    Newsom, who has not been afraid to wade into controversial national issues such as gay marriage, appeared with a group of elected officials on the steps of City Hall to support immigrants, “documented as well as undocumented.”Newsom also signed a resolution sponsored by Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval, and passed unanimously by the Board of Supervisors, urging San Francisco law enforcement not to comply with criminal provisions of any new immigration bill.

    “San Francisco stands foursquare in strong opposition to the rhetoric coming out of Washington, D.C.,” Newsom said. “If people think we were defiant on the gay marriage issue, they haven’t seen defiance.”

    It is not the first time San Francisco has weighed in on the immigration issue. In 1989, the Board of Supervisors made San Francisco a “City of Refuge.” The ordinance forbids city resources from being used to enforce federal immigration laws or to gather or disseminate information regarding the status of residents of The City. The Board of Supervisors passed a resolution reaffirming the ordinance in January.

    The bill at issue is H.R. 4437, a House measure that would make it a crime to be in the United States illegally or offer aid to illegal immigrants. It also would enlist military and law enforcement to help stop illegal immigration, require employers to verify the legal status of workers and build new fences along the U.S.-Mexico border.
    Thursday’s press conference came shortly after a group of bipartisan U.S. senators announced they reached a compromise on their version of immigration legislation, which would not criminalize illegal immigration or assisting illeglal immigrants.

    Newsom said he was disappointed with Democratic leaders for agreeing to the compromise and that he supported a more immigrant-friendly bill that was put forward by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass, which was part of the basis of the compromise legislation.

    Newsom and other city officials also derided U.S. House of Representatives bill 4437, which calls for building a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border and criminalizing groups that provide aid to illegal immigrants.

    “National-origin discrimination is the civil rights issue of our time,” said Rodel Rodis, a member of the City College board and an immigration attorney. “I could go to jail because of helping illegal immigrants.”
     
  2. Pabst

    Pabst

    Imagine there's no countries,
    It isnt hard to do,
    Nothing to kill or die for,
    No religion too,
    Imagine all the people
    living life in peace...

    Imagine no possesions,
    I wonder if you can,
    No need for greed or hunger,
    A brotherhood of man,
    Imagine all the people
    Sharing all the world...
     
  3. gavin newson picks and chooses what legislation he "chooses" to follow, and not too long ago he broke california state law by facilitating gay marriage (against california law) and ordering his subordinates to facilitate same

    whatever one thinks about gay amrriage, this is a violation of seperation of powers (executive branch overriding the legislative), as well as a criminal act

    he wants to be the king of his own little monarchy and he is a despot at heart
     
  4. I wish I could pick and choose what laws I will obey without punishment.
     
  5. Was George Wallace arrested?



     
  6. If he broke the law he should have been but didn't somebody take it upon himself and shoot him?

    Hmmmm.
     
  7. Yes, a reactionary (probably a republican) shot and paralyzed Wallace....



    On a sunny May 15, 1972, Wallace was speaking before a friendly crowd of about 1,000 at a shopping center in Laurel, Md. There were few hecklers in this group. The candidate spoke on a podium behind a bulletproof shield on his familiar theme about the need to restore law and order and was greeted with cheers and enthusiastic clapping. He usually wore a bulletproof vest under his shirt but left it off because it was a hot, humid day. After speaking behind the shield, the candidate wanted to press the flesh, an aspect of campaigning the extroverted Wallace relished. He took off his suit jacket and rolled up his sleeves to shake hands with people.

    A blonde, smiling young man, wearing dark glasses and neatly attired in red, white, and blue clothes with a Wallace button prominently displayed on his jacket, made his way to the front of the crowd. He got close to the candidate, then pulled a .38-caliber revolver out of his pocket and fired five times. All five bullets hit Wallace. Some went through him to injure three other people, two male security officers and a female spectator, as well.


     
  8. Probably a republican sick of his racism and lawbreaking. We all know how the democrats were against the civil rights movement.
     
  9. Yes, Dixiecrats did not support civil rights.

    No thinking person confuses those Dixiecrats with modern day democrats....



     
  10. Contrary to what Al Gore said in 1999 his father voted against the civil rights act. Was he a dixiecrat?
     
    #10     Apr 7, 2006