Saddam is dead, are we safer now?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Dec 30, 2006.

Are we safer now that Saddam is dead.

  1. Yes

    12 vote(s)
    26.1%
  2. No

    34 vote(s)
    73.9%
  1. Is the US safer without Saddam? Maybe. Safer directly without his activities. Plenty of nutcases wanting to take his place though. Plus I don't live in NYC, so it don't bother me none.
     
    #41     Jan 2, 2007
  2.  
    #42     Jan 2, 2007
  3. Mucho mucho logical fallacy, red herrings, and dodging the questions in your comments...

    Way to many to list, and what good would that do?....Lets just say "par for the Pabst."

    Are we safer now?

    Bottom line?

    Most say no...

    Oh, and remember that white dude that was pissed off at America for the gulf war, some dude who blew up Oklahoma City...

    And that was by most accounts a "righteous" war...

    Think any disaffected Vets might hold a grudge against the government following Bush's Iraq War down the road?

    Right...we are safer now...sure thing...

     
    #43     Jan 2, 2007
  4. We would be even safer if someone can figure out how to get rid
    of that idiot who is now the leader of Iran.

    Hope he goes next. We would be even much safer then.

    Then the nut in N. Korea.

    One at a time...:cool:
     
    #44     Jan 3, 2007
  5. <i>"Sunni's like wael will tell you that the Shia' are more "civilized" (kneejerk judgmental lapse on my part) than the Sunni's."</i>

    Just FYI, Pabst: It's the other way around. Sunnis commonly look down on the Shia as the more barbaric and primitive of the two sects.


    The Shia holiday of Ashoura (or 'sado-masochism parade day') adds to this perception.

    <img src=http://www.factsofisrael.com/en/images/articles/lebanon-muslims.jpg> <img src=http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/36538000/jpg/_36538306_ashura_boy_ap150.jpg>
     
    #45     Jan 3, 2007

  6. Were the shoe on the other foot, you'd evade these questions all day long...
    But I'll just flat out admit it: Your points above are correct.
     
    #46     Jan 3, 2007
  7. I guess this one's a bummer...

    With the other comments, maybe we should of stayed home and
    waited for the next terrorist attack instead of taking it to them.

    We all agree that the "terrorists" have all run to Iraq to get in on the
    action correct?

    Guess where they would be if not in Iraq? They would be here in the US.

    Or maybe not. Maybe they would be having a peace march somewhere...

    Amazing nothing has happened here in the US since we went to Iraq...

    I wonder why? Maybe because the nuts think their jihad is happening in
    Iraq!

    And it is if we stay there. If we run, we will look like cowards and
    they will come after us with a vengeance like you have never seen.

    Lets hope the Democrats don't give us that one for a present...:(
     
    #47     Jan 3, 2007
  8. And you're the best, I suppose? Sure.
     
    #48     Jan 3, 2007
  9. What a load of bullshit. But if Rush, et al, says it, it must be true.

     
    #49     Jan 3, 2007
  10. this guy is fucking unbelievable, he swallowed every drop of bush's cum and keeps coming for more. biggest sucker i ever met.
     
    #50     Jan 3, 2007