I believe I first acknowledged they went higher. Don't tell me you're going to try to distort what I said on this thread?
Manolo, as opposed to your paper-trading Mecro actually trades listed stocks like BSC, GS, LEH, and MWD. Since you weren't trading them, how can you even begin to argue Mecro's statement? You can't. Because you aren't trading them. Enough said.
Good point waggle. About as coherent as when you tried to take my comments on this thread out-of context, until I put a stop to that. I can easily argue with mecro. Lets see, LEH is +.80 and MER is down -.75. Now let's go back to my statement that even if there are blowout numbers, I believe the charts want to trade down. Only an idiot, well I guess that would be you, would dispute this. Must I go back to my quotes that are still on this thread? Has anyone heard a dumber quote than this "you can't argue mecros statement because you aren't trading them"?? Why don't you tell that to all the CNBC broadcasters, and everyone else who may be interested in stocks, but not trade some specific stocks. Yes, I didn't trade the brokerage stocks today, but that doesn't make me any less qualified to analyze them. To the contrary, my 10 year track record of superior trading makes me very qualified to talk about trading. Not to mention my unbelievably accurate call last sunday, when the S&P was at a 52 week high of 1157, that we were about to see a significant correction. And not to mention all of my great calls on ET. Oh boy...you must be a horrible poker player. I've punk'd you so many times now. You're the easiest fool on ET to bait.
Hey Manolo, I finally agree with your assessment of yourself as the "Paper-Trading" Tiger of ET: Quote from Manolo/James Stock/Grandmaster-Baitor: "paper tiger is right = one unbelievable audited record since 1996."