S&P 500 looking very toppy

Discussion in 'Trading' started by Romeo, Jul 8, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The indicies have been driven to these dizzying heights because most of the surplus cash in the economic system is going into housing and the securities market.Notice that these two investment vehicles are the strongest sectors over the last 18 months.Excess liquidity , has created a disproportionate imbalance in both securities and housing markets.Should both these markets correct in sync. ,the last three years may seem tame in comparison.:)
     
    #121     Jul 28, 2003
  2. Romeo

    Romeo

    and...

    and I know we're getting closer to the top.
    My guess is next week we will see it.
     
    #122     Jul 28, 2003
  3. Romeo

    Romeo

    Like I said, a few more bullish calls, and the S&P looks toppy to me.
     
    #123     Jul 29, 2003
  4. Romeo

    Romeo

    I know what I'm talking about. Dammit!

    Everyone seemed bullish today on CNBC, but no ole Romeo.

    Romeo says the S&P is looking toppy!!!
     
    #124     Jul 31, 2003
  5. You sound like a refugee from the Yahoo boards!:(
     
    #125     Jul 31, 2003
  6. Mvic

    Mvic

    You were looking for a new high of 1025? I know we need to be flexible as traders but switching your prediction and then harkening back to the first one when the market swings that way doesn't do allot for your credibility.
     
    #126     Jul 31, 2003
  7. Romeo

    Romeo

    DO NOT MISQUOTE ME! I said we could see a maximum top of 1025, and we got to about 1005 today. Read my 1st post in this thread. Heck read ALL my posts in this thread, I've been very consistent, dude.

    And the word is "alot". Not knowing how to spell doesn't do much for your credibility.
     
    #127     Jul 31, 2003
  8. Romeo

    Romeo

    This was misconstrued by you as what, dude?
     
    #128     Jul 31, 2003
  9. Romeo

    Romeo

    You sound alittle like Tom Petty.
     
    #129     Jul 31, 2003
  10. Mvic

    Mvic

    I am not in search of credibility on this board as you clearly are.

    1025 does not jive with a double top, at least not what passes for a double top in my view.

    For your edification it is "a lot" (you assumed that I wrote allot due to ignorance, your assumption was erroneous). Alot is not a word.

    Ironically, I still see a double top.

     
    #130     Jul 31, 2003
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.