The Economist writes about how the war is represented to Russians in media... The Putin Show How the war in Ukraine appears to Russians https://www.economist.com/interactive/international/2022/05/17/the-putin-show
It is clear that Putin has whipped up the "protect the Motherland" rhetoric and quite successfully controls the media. Problem is. It is creating a sea of patriots waving their flags in moscow and the old guys in the villages with a kazillion medals on their chests from WW2. But it is not translating into soldiers wanting to go to Ukraine. Never has, never will. Putin also shot himself in the foot a bit with the propaganda by using it for decades to portray the Ukrainians as Russians or fellow slavs and "part of us." Lots of people seem unable to make the sudden about face now "Why are we killing grammie in Ukraine." Putin can fill a stadium with Russian flag wavers stomping their feet in unison and who swear in blood that they will die defending Mother Russia. Meanwhile the guys running the recruitment booth set up outside the stadium are watching I Love Lucy and Gilligan's Island reruns on their phones. So yeh, he is doing all sorts of scary stuff but he is mighty low on troops and some of them he has already are dysfunctional. So if he is going to get more troops somewhere it will be in a way that will continue to alienate the people BIGTIME. He got a problem there. In the end you can run the entire war with Wagner fighters. Ukrainians got big problems too and i am not saying otherwise. But all that propaganda advantage highlighted in the article is not producing new crops of fighters and mobilization would/will be a nightmare. He is whipping them up to prepare them for suffering economically. It's a service that all Russian governments provide for their people. Eliminating the suffering? Not so much.
Yeah... your propaganda sucks if your government must resort to using the courts abuse Wikipedia for telling the truth. Wikipedia fights Russian order to remove Ukraine war information https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...er-remove-ukraine-war-information-2022-06-13/ The Wikimedia Foundation, which owns Wikipedia, has filed an appeal against a Moscow court decision demanding that it remove information related to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, arguing that people have a right to know the facts of the war. A Moscow court fined the Wikimedia Foundation 5 million roubles ($88,000) for refusing to remove what it termed disinformation from Russian-language Wikipedia articles on the war including "The Russian Invasion of Ukraine", "War Crimes during the Russian Invasion of Ukraine" and "Massacre in Bucha". "This decision implies that well-sourced, verified knowledge on Wikipedia that is inconsistent with Russian government accounts constitutes disinformation," Stephen LaPorte, Associate General Counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, said in a statement. Wikipedia, which says it offers "the second draft of history", is one of the few remaining major fact-checked Russian-language sources of information for Russians after a crackdown on media in Moscow. "The government is targeting information that is vital to people's lives in a time of crisis," LaPorte said. "We urge the court to reconsider in favor of everyone's rights to knowledge access and free expression." The Moscow court argued that what it cast as the disinformation on Wikipedia posed a risk to public order in Russia and that the Foundation, which is headquartered in San Francisco, California, was operating inside Russia. The Foundation was prosecuted under a law about the failure to delete banned information. The case was brought by Russia's communications regulator Roskomnadzor, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wikipedia. The Wikipedia appeal, which was filed on June 6 with details released on Monday, argues that removing information is a violation of human rights. It said Russia had no jurisdiction over the Wikimedia Foundation, which was globally available in over 300 languages. Wikipedia entries are written and edited by volunteers. Narratives of the war, Europe's biggest ground invasion since World War Two, vary drastically -- and have become highly politicised with journalists in both Moscow and the West routinely accused of misreporting the war. Ukraine says it is the victim of an unprovoked imperial-style land grab by Russia and that it will fight to the end to reclaim the territory that Russian forces have occupied. Kyiv has repeatedly asked the West for more help to fight Russia. President Vladimir Putin and Russian officials do not use the words "war" or "invasion". They cast it a "special military operation" aimed at preventing the persecution of Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine. Putin also says the conflict is a turning point in Russian history: a revolt by Moscow against the United States, which he says has humiliated Russia since the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union and pushed to enlarge the NATO military alliance. Ukraine and its Western backers deny Moscow's claims that Russian speakers were persecuted. Kyiv says Russian forces have committed war crimes, including killings, torture and rape in places such as Bucha. Russia says the alleged evidence of war crimes consists of carefully constructed fakes and that Ukraine and its Western backers have spread disinformation about Russian forces.
What they possibly know but don't tell is that a nuclear response to a perceived attack is baked in to the Western deterrent. Otherwise what they allude to would be an effective enough strategy and of course that was understood at the beginning of the cold war. Any firing of a Sarmat whether with dummy warheads or not will get them actually nuked.