Russian Hacking Questions

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AAAintheBeltway, Dec 14, 2016.

  1. Good1

    Good1





    All of this "CIA" "Russia" rhetoric is about influencing faithless electors.
     
    #51     Dec 15, 2016
  2. Just when you think they can't sink any lower.....
     
    #52     Dec 15, 2016
  3. jem

    jem

    So if they swing the electoral college votes.. what happens?
    Is trump being proactive about this.
    is it time for him to grant electors free stays in the lincoln bedroom or something else a democrat would do?
     
    #53     Dec 15, 2016
    MoneyMatthew likes this.
  4. jem

    jem

    this electoral college thing is evil genius. if the cia is working to subvert our electoral process... we must know.

    a hearing has to be done by tomorrow.

    isn't time for patriots on the hill to subpoena the cia and its proof for an emergency public hearing to make it clear..

    That
    1. no evidence the vote was hacked.
    2. let us know the basis for this rumor that there is a consensus that the cia thinks russia was biased in its attempts to hack.
    3. that it was not the dnc staffer who leaked the info to wikileaks even thoght assange and others said it was
    4. that the dnc staffer who was murdered in a coordinated looking hit had nothing to do with this. .
    5. that they know who phished podesta.
    6. that Putin is not telling the truth when russia denies putin had anything to do with it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2016
    #54     Dec 15, 2016

  5. Yup, way to go Martin, this election is not legitimate. Fuck Putin. We need a re-vote or a revolt. It's clear that Putin got Trump elected.
     
    #55     Dec 15, 2016
  6. fhl

    fhl

  7. Sadly, it has come to exactly that. As we saw, we certainly can't depend on the media. They are part of the democrat party machinery. We knew it all along, but now they can't really deny it. They just act like it doesn't matter. All the issues are so clearcut after all, that there is only one correct side anyway.

    We know very well that if the situation were reversed, ie let's say mexico released embarrassing stuff on Trump, the democrats would be jeering us for even mentioning it. They would justify the hacking as a public service and them obsess over the material.
     
    #57     Dec 15, 2016
  8. fhl

    fhl

  9. Good1

    Good1

    Word is a number of agencies were called to the Hill, but none showed up to brief congess. I think they want to brief the Electors privately, on a tarmac somewhere.
     
    #59     Dec 15, 2016
  10. Good1

    Good1

    Yup, that's exactly what the CIA wants to tell ("brief") the Electors after showing them the Martin Sheen evidence on a tarmac somewhere.
     
    #60     Dec 15, 2016