The Podesta "hack" is well documented in the network security community. Any network security expert who looks through the available details will know that it was not Russia. Now the hack of the Democratic party servers is not documented in detail. It may (or may not) be a state player (like Russia). More details would need to be made available to the network security community to arrive at any type of conclusion.
U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...personally-involved-u-s-election-hack-n696146
While everyone argues about this, only one thing matters: How many Ricters amongst the Electors can be rolled over by this CIA propaganda, coordinated by Nancy Pelosi's daughter? She only needs 38 Electors who think like Ricter and futurecurrents to flip on Dec 19. Word is she has 30 so far. All of the histrionic ranting, including Olberman's over-the-top rant, is for one purpose only: to give all the Ricters amongst the electorate the excuse they need to provide cover to steal (not seal) the election on Dec. 19. After all, isn't that what the CIA does, routinely, to influence elections? And now, with its permission to run propaganda campaigns in the U.S., why is this coup surprising? Apparently, 85% of Electors are Democratic, and 28 states allow them to vote any way they wish . Don't think they can't find 38 to blackmail, bribe, or bamboozle with propaganda? Yes, the CIA is going to "brief" any Elector who wants to be bamboozled...Electors who think like Ricter and futercurrents.
Don't you entirely miss the point? It does not matter who hacked the DNC and Podesta email accounts. What matters is that such individual or organization exclusively focused their efforts on Democrats but not Republicans. The problem is not about the shit that was unearthed (I am all for disclosure and more information than less) but it is established fact that the leaks were only sought from the Democrat side. That does not bother you or raise eyebrows? In this context it does not matter whether it was the Russians or little critters from Mars
Sure, so a few Republicans just have to come forward to state they equally were attempted to be baited by phishing attacks. This would totally debunk the allegations that such attempts (call it hacking or Phishing or whatever) were one-sided. Has that happened? If yes then i missed it. Some evidence would of course be very helpful to lend more credibility to such claims
... To what and whom were they then linked? If you claim they were not linked to Russia that obviously implies you know where they were linked to.
Radical Russian Republican Terrorist yeah, try that, it worked for them when they called them Radical Islamic Terrorist and we wouldn't
How do you know? Maybe they hacked the republicans and found nothing of real interest. All we can say is a lot of crap came out about the Democrats and the crap that came out was blatantly corrupt and disgusting. Apart from that, all we have is speculation. I understand that you folks don't like the results of the election, and you'll cling to any shred of evidence that might throw the result into question. I get it. The folks on the right might do the same were the shoe on the other foot, and you folks on the left would be telling them to accept it. Fact is, no one has proof, everyone has speculation, and the results won't be overturned. Let's just get on with our lives already.