Is that what you heard on your owning the libs tictok? You go around claiming to be so woke but you’re lost in space. Yes. CNN is a much better source than the epoch times. It’s not even a question. However, no matter your source caveat empor. If you aren’t verifying what you’re consuming then you are, as you like to say, an NPC. And yes, you, @Tsing Tao , are an NPC. You’re not even kind of “woke.”
when did I ever claim to be woke? Please don't tell me I'm woke - that's a huge insult. LOL...I claim to be woke. Where?
This isn’t directed at you @Tsing Tao but the situation Russia is pushing… Most of this is on the Germans and payments for the next round of contracts is due mid May. Germans are already signaling an early pullout of oil considering the situation with Poland now and this could just speed up the process.
Poland's military is a no match to Russian Army, of course you can base your hopes on something,better than nothing i suppose https://www.overtdefense.com/2021/0...-polish-armed-forces-obliterated-just-5-days/ I think i seen a big board display of that battle when i visited Vilnius,it was in the newly renovated castle or whatever fortification this was up on the big hill.
What do you think some is? You claim you know better than the experts and science on everything from Covid to Russian sanctions. You are a fountain of wokeness. It’s all nonsense from you.
"What do I think some is"? Huh? I don't claim to know better than folks, I just claim that you don't know. You (and others) speak with authority as to what "will" happen and what "must" happen. I think its funny, actually. I don't claim to know either. I can tell you what I think will happen, but that's about it. What I do know however, that is relevant to this conversation is the following: 1. Sources that have been "trusted" as "experts" have been outed to be untruthful and pushing narratives. 2. Sources that have been considered "misinformation" have been proven right as time has passed. Not all, but in enough cases to make a difference and to make challenging the "main narrative" worthy and proper. But keep defending the failing establishment all you want. Time is on my side, my friend, not yours. I'll continue to be skeptical of claims and media outlets until I have hard data showing me why or that something is likely. If that pisses you off, well I'm sorry. Perhaps you should put me back on ignore - I hope you don't, but I don't plan on changing the way I view the world because it bothers you.
When things get serious American Army will not even fight to defend the Brits,only themselves. I think Russians want to test that theory,maybe next year. You can bookmark my post for reference
This is silly. An attack on one NATO country means all NATO countries enter the fray. That's the whole point to the treaty.
The treaty is to sell weapons and keep the Germans down. In Berlin next to Checkpoint Charlie is a big billboard on one side pctured is a Russian soldier i think from their ground forces and same across the road,American soldier from US Air Force.At least it was few years ago when last time i was around there. There so no other Nato soldier,because when things gets serious US will only fight for themselves,everyone else is expendable. Russians are getting stronger and will want to put Nato to the test,they don't have enough quantities of weapon systems yet, this is why they are rolling the "ball" slow in Ukraine. EDIT: Major reason is possession of large stockpiles of nuclear weapons.This forces both US and Russia to only fight for themselves,because of risk to their homelands