Right he should agree because currently we have the biggest pussy of them in the WH. Better move fast. Meanwhile google WWI and WWII how many U.S. and allied dead soldiers.
There was no requirement in the Budapest Memorandum that the US defend Ukraine if attacked even though uninformed sources report that. It was discussed, along with many other possible scenarios, in the lead up to finalizing the agreement but it never became part of the agreement. Exactly the same environment we are in right now. Lots of scenarios and proposed requirements are flying around by the minute but anything that does not make it into the final written agreement, well, is not part of the final written agreement. And even those who attempt to say that the Budapst Agreement required defense of Ukraine, agree that the background discussion was about if Ukraine was attacked with nuclear weapons, the US and other should be required to provide nuclear defense in return for Ukraine having given up its nuclear arsenal. That would not apply to the current Ukraine invasion. Yet, anyway.
Was Clinton the one who promised protection if they got rid of their nukes? I am trying to remember without Google.
Clinton got the benefit of lower costs for defense which, of course, he claimed for balancing the budget.
the point was Ukraine promised to be neutral not hostile to anyone as soon Usa financed coup and install puppet anti Russia government that ukraine that got promises of protection stopped existing