2 sentences timestamped On a serious note, as long as someone provides value and truth via facts, - probably, there's hardly any problem (?) If it turns out into a spring of lies/nonsense/souce:TikTok/insults, that type of approach, like the Russian propagandists in here do, then it's a problem. After all, another member can be ignored, if a certain character trait is unacceptable. Yet, before that, a dialogue one on one, in DM's could be a viable option. p.s prob one of the last from Ridley (movies). Lucky Russians, the weather saved them back then. As usual. p.p.s was searching for Netherlands announcement about F16eens for Ukraine. Wanted to see the reactions of Netherland politicians / citizens, given the fact of the destroyed plane and Dutch kids inside, years ago.
I understand. That's why Russians: install S400 systems in Crimea build protection around the bridge sinks ships around the bridge against waterdrones warn for a reaction if the bridge will be destroyed placed surveillance cameras all around, and on the bridge I had to switch to Russian logic before I understood you. ROFLMAO.
I was just reading that the Russians knew they had an equipment problem with their moon lander but instead of investigating, I assume taking another orbit to do so. they went ahead because they wanted to beat the Indians.. Egits. They are a stereotype squared.
I re-watched K-19 The Widowmaker the other day in anticipation Not a bad film, mix that up with The Death of Stalin black comedy and you have roughly whats going on. Just with women and kids raped and blown to pieces.
it was putin's project before the war, now the war materials don't go thru this bridge anymore. just keep watching the ukrianian live map, see where the fightings are, far from the bridge. https://liveuamap.com/
Just watching drones hit the bridge. Why do they continue trying to take it out if it doesn't mean much? And why is Russia so intent on stopping them?