Read again, I spoke to that point. You are an idiot who would never concede nor even consider a point made by someone whose asshole does not pass the left idiology smell test.
You didn't speak about conditions of public school at all, you are equating it to 'free internet' as if that's an alternative to schooling for little kids. I should concede that free internet courses is an alternative to actual schooling and teachers? If that's true then all Republicans should homeschool their kids and send all the school funding to poor neighborhoods. No? Thought so. You make lazy, unthoughtful comments predisposed to racist religious views, they are illogical and nonsensical - there is zero reason for me to concede to any of it. And they are no different than your pro-Russia comments 'Half of tanks supplied to Ukraine are lost' - you made that up, zero evidence, zero sources. Why should people concede to fiction?
Most homeschooled children are from conservative households, dimwit. How come Asian, Hispanic and many others who initially started out in poor neighborhoods made it out? How come inner cities are predominantly inhabited by blacks on the street level and not others? Those were striving areas in the past. After everyone else moved into the suburbs, the inner cities have turned into shitholes. Nobody did that to blacks. They have done it to themselves. If faced with the choice between allocating free cash flow to a brand new shiny truck or to kids education 99% of blacks choose the ride. 99% Asians choose child education. That's the real difference: CHOICES.
Of course they are, but we are talking about success stories here, not failures. Homeschooled children do worse in the job market, it's great for religious indoctrination, not so much for technical skills. https://www.cardus.ca/research/educ...ect-of-school-sector-on-extended-adolescence/ They did? Rates seem same to me, its not like Latinos get the good schools either. Yes, the blacks first enslaved themselves, then segregated themselves and then got systematically targeted by whites with low funding for every public service, they did it to themselves. Everything is so simple when you are white, you can choose not to be black.
You might not realize that you make points against your argument. Latinos who don't get much more formal education than blacks still on average fare much better in life than blacks. That is the point I initially made, that its not the formal education nor any other joint variable that explains the vastly different outcomes by ethnicity but ethnic specific variables that ultimately hold black backs. Things in Africa just don't move along that quickly than in the rest of the world. It's a mentality issue. If you don't come today then you come tomorrow. Oh no, I said it, something in the DNA. Can't have that, that would vehemently contradict the leftist agenda. Though you happily acknowledge that there are other parts in DNA, for example things that cause an ethnicity to perform on average better in athletics and sports in general. But not on the communist agenda; nothing can be allowed in dna that would partly explain different economic outcomes. Because that would mean that the rest of society does not have to feel guilty anymore. And if that happens the free money flow stops. Can't have that.
Latinos don't have a history of being slaves either. You can say the same about rural whites. You mean like the whites in Alabama, Mississippi and Kentucky? Or they have different DNA? So you went from CHOICES to the DNA which you cannot choose at all. Did you think nobody would notice your shift here? LOL, you lose another debate, must be a habit.