Rush Limbaugh, big fat ass freaking idiot...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Oct 23, 2006.

  1. Well...no fucking shit!

    Thanks.

    The article stunk to high heaven... even to the "Most casual observer." *

    *(inside joke....My Diify-Q Prof used to say this all the time)

    :D



     
    #91     Oct 25, 2006
  2. Yes, you've never revealed a 'faith-based agenda [sic]' on these boards. I'm sure no one here remembers 'Magistrates are materialized out of pure potentiality'.

    What a fucking joke you are. You engage in intellectual dishonesty in almost every post you make, including the from which these quotes are taken, which contains two separate instances. To cite only the most recent example, what about your flip flop on moral relativism?

    The only thing left to explain is how you think anyone will give any credence to your claims, given the fact that the posts which show show you pursuing blatantly faith-based agenda and engaging in the most crass type of intellectual dishonesty are a matter of public record.

    Sickening.
     
    #92     Oct 25, 2006
  3. Troll gobbledygook...

     
    #93     Oct 26, 2006

  4. Hey, i love that line:D
    Maybe they are.............

    (theme from twilight zone......)
     
    #94     Oct 26, 2006
  5. yep, that was one of zEvader's zingers in his 100% faith-based thread dealing with the teaching of ID in schools.

    This was his suggestion for the origin of human life on earth. He later recanted, of course, when it was convenient for him to do so.
     
    #95     Oct 26, 2006
  6. Hey, sounds good, but the magistrates bit?

    Thats not a zinger, its a classic:D
    I beleive, Z's idioms are divinely inspired, and that belief is a huge aspect to faith based retorts.

    "I can make up any excuse, or false logic or ad hominem, out of pure existientiality of poop......
    people are imperfect, and sinful, and dirty, and so is poop-therefore, people are made out of poop,
    like Mr hanky,
    and the potentiality of poop-ness must be the irrefutable divine source of everything-, such a divine source must be as clean as the driven snow, fresh as a daisy, and largely resembling a heavily bleached sorbent toilet roll, soft and forgiving, yet there, nonetheless.

    Its not to us, to question, the existence of the roll , it was clearly designed to deal with poopness!! It must have been manufactured out of PURE potentiality!!!! "


    Yup, clazzic Z.
     
    #96     Oct 26, 2006
  7. I've been skimming over your posts now for the better part of a couple of years. Skimming because typically they are moronic, yet they are nearly impossible to avoid seeing because there are so many of them.

    Today this paragraph caught my eye. Perhaps because I am a resident of Missouri. No, I don't eat pork rinds or fuck my cousin. But even us Missourians understand when we have been insulted. Frankly, I've seen so much horseshit spew from your mouth over the last couple of years that such a comment should not be a surprise. Yet it goes well beyond the bounds of civility. One can only wonder who is the bigger "freaking idiot". You? Or Rush Limbaugh. If he is you're definitely giving him a run for his money.

    So that you may fill in a few gaps in your knowledge, in Missouri we will be voting this November on Constitutional Amendment No. 2. Amongst other provisions, it will "ensure Missouri patients have access to any therapies and cures, and allow Missouri researchers to conduct any research, permitted under federal law" and "prohibit state or local governments from preventing or discouraging lawful stem cell research, therapies and cures."


    Note, this will be voted on regardless of who Missourians elect in the Talent-McCaskill contest. Thus, if you were truly interested in the subject of stem cell research, etc. you would doubtless be more interested in the Constitutional Amendment No. 2 than the Talent-McCaskill contest. Which brings up the question of Michael J. Fox. For some reason, he chose to run his ad in support of McCaskill, with no mention whatsoever on the Constitutional Amendment No. 2.

    I think we all know what Michael J. Fox's motives were and why he was picked to deliver the message. As some of his defenders state in this thread:

    "Fox has appeared in ABC's "Boston Legal" this season. In his scenes, taped over the summer, Fox does not shake or loll his head as he does in the Cardin commercial, but does appear to be restraining himself, appearing almost rigid at times.

    A source with direct knowledge of Fox's illness who viewed the Cardin ad said Fox is not acting to exaggerate the effects of the disease. The source said Fox's scenes in "Boston Legal" had to be taped around his illness, as he worked to control the tremors associated with Parkinson's for limited periods of time."

    Funny that they could not find a time to film the ad when his shaking was under somewhat better control eh?

    OldTrader
     
    #97     Oct 26, 2006
  8. The next time anyone is suffering from parkinsons, or any damn thing else, be sure to let that be reflected in no uncertain terms here.
    Ok, maybe in chit chat, or hook up, or anywhere else, but this forum is demeaning to anyone in the face of the direct issues involved.

    Or any damn OTHER serious issue that may exist, because if you havent looked at the title of this forum,

    It is entirely anti-thetic to any possible solutions.
     
    #98     Oct 26, 2006
  9. Okay, so you are a dittohead.

    Not much else to say, is there? If I want your opinion, I can just tune into the EIB...

     
    #99     Oct 26, 2006
  10. I wonder.Obviously Rush doesnt have Parkinsons so it is easy for him to say that MJF should have medicated up to suppress the effects of his ailment before doing the commercial rather than let the audience see the disease in all its glory. If, on the other hand, Rush was doing a testimonial type ad for his ailment ( erectile dysfunction) would he be man enough to address it like Bob Dole OR would he feel obliged to medicate up as he suggests MJF should have done and showed us the treatment in its full glory?
     
    #100     Oct 26, 2006