So I take it you have no rebuttal for demolition of WTC7 Pretty clear to me which one of us is pathetic. Also it seems to me your purpose is to start fights to confuse the issue of traitorous government and traitorous banks. This is becoming pretty clear. Are you going to be the last one 5 years from now still defending your precious traitors and elite technocrats. Your numbers are dwindling. Oh and I almost forgot. You are on Ignore
not good enough, very immature. Explain to me how a modern sky scraper can fall the way it did from fires on one side on few lower floors I know what is the reason for your ignorance........Fear. Well I got bad news, by allowing traitors in the government to continue things will only get worse, the next false flag will be bigger.
Now that's rich, a conspiracy quack pretending evidence matters. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm but really, you jackwagon, it's more about your personal agenda than anything else and it's plain that you're a dude with issues
This debunking site is filled with lies Even if WTC7 had more than few fires, it would not cause the bulding to collapse the way it did. It is a physical impossibility. The only way collapse like that can happen is for columns to be cut. Which by the way is called controlled demolition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM Shame you don't have basic abilities to put the two and two together.
I held back cause I didn't want to insult you, but if you can't understand that building WTC7 can't fall the way it did for the reason they say it did well you have below 100 IQ