'fund these projects' so far 99.9999999% of the projects are.... getting you to hand over fiat for nothing. air. yes, you can only buy digital land and bored apes with crypto i rest my case
Ill translate. "We need to hypnotize the 99% of the population to embrace the fiction of crypto valuation. If we depend on the few whales who have manipulated the price up and the 1% of zealots and opportunists, we're doomed. " oh yeah, this guy is a moron did i miss anything ?
This was posted 4 months ago. I repeat, Elvis has left the building. BTC back then was mid-40Ks. Now it is around 30K. From 45K to 100K that is not a stratospheric raise. It is a decent rally, but not stratospheric.
Roy is floating in stratospheric heights. How many times did he already blow up? Return goes down, down, down, down... since 2010.
You've got the wrong person mixed up with wrong charts... It was Dr. Victor Niederhoffer that was short-vol and got crushed in the crash of 97. Roy Niederhoffer plays opposite, and is long-vol. Not a single time did Roy blow up, he made profits in the crash of 97 and many others... Please get the brothers correct.
Again..this chart has been spot on. Almost scary. https://stats.buybitcoinworldwide.com/cycle-repeat/
The tiplehalvening of ETH is expected to be spectacular, the only issue is that it may be priced in already. That said, the only major downside is that there is so much ETH locked up in staking, that there will be some downward pressure when profit-taking starts...
Has crypto finally run out of greater fools? (a conversation on Reddit) I agree with this dude: tiberiumx "I think it has probably peaked. Where can they go after superbowl commercials, celebrity shilling, and just saturating advertising channels for the last two years to find new marks? And remember, they have to find more marks than they did the last time to keep the illusion of exponential growth. Sure, manipulation and counterfeit stablecoins masquerading as real dollars can prop up prices for awhile, but they've gotta balance that with having at least some liquidity. Not to mention public opinion has started shifting against it -- there are fewer people credulously accepting the idea that it could be the future of money than there were before, at least as a percentage, and far more public criticism available which was essentially none two years ago. Just as an anecdote: when I open up comments on a crypto Facebook ad in the last few months, there's a lot of people calling it out as a scam. I haven't seen that before. The real danger is that it can crowbar its way into the real financial system. There are an absolute asston of morons who will take zero time to learn about it but will be like "oh, it's just a high risk investment, I'll put 1% of my asset allocation into it". The SEC should never allow that, but we all know how easily bribed US regulatory bodies are. And the crypto industry is spending a ton of money on lobbying." The reason I quoted this, because it is an opposite viewpoint to Roy's.
Your remark has one assumption and one stated fact. The stated fact is obviously wrong. Roy Niederhoffer has never written a book. His brother, Victor Niederhoffer, was the author of a well received book The Education of a Speculator.