Well, there is before-the-midterm Trump and after-the-midterm Trump. And there is before-mueller's-report-comes-out-trump and then after-the-report-trump. Once the midterms are over and muellers report is out so that he cannot be accused of meddling then Sessions goes. And then Trump will let the new AG replace Rosenstein- maybe even prosecute him.
He will be gone soon enough. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...actions-protected-political-embarrassment-not FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’ There is now a concrete storyline backed by irrefutable evidence: The FBI allowed itself to take political opposition research created by one party to defeat another in an election, treated it like actionable intelligence, presented it to the court as substantiated, and then used it to justify spying on an adviser for the campaign of that party's duly chosen nominee for president in the final days of a presidential election. And when, nine months later, the FBI could not prove the allegation of collusion between Trump and Russia, unverified evidence was leaked to the media to try to sustain public support for a continued investigation.
https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-ame...lawyer-plot-to-record-remove-trump-not-a-joke Former FBI lawyer: Plot to record, remove Trump not a joke Baker told Congress last week that his boss — then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe — was dead serious about the idea of surreptitiously recording the 45th president and using the evidence to make the case that Trump should be removed from office, according to my sources. Baker told lawmakers he wasn’t in the meeting McCabe had with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which the subject came up. But he did have firsthand conversations with McCabe and the FBI lawyer assigned to McCabe, Lisa Page, about the issue. “As far as Baker was concerned, this was a real plan being discussed,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation. “It was no laughing matter for the FBI.”
Did you hear that there is a new SCOTUS? You said that would never happen before the elections in November. Blahahahahahahaha
I won $100 bucks on my bet with Arnie. Good Bro, Arnie. I think you need some help: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/kennedy-leaving-scotus.322469/page-20#post-4681085
Destriero is a child trapped in a mans body. Its pathetic really. Or sad. Depends how you look at it. He's lucky I'm so nice...he has no idea....we might have to start sharing the GS files from 2000. Naaaaa.... I wouldn't do that, even to him. Actually I would lol... but gotta keep all the folks I keep (company) with happy. They'll get pissed. He's not worth the dox.
hmmmm....I wonder why he is scared. https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/10/rod-rosenstein-congress-trump/ ROSENSTEIN NO LONGER EXPECTED TO APPEAR BEFORE CONGRESS
Indeed. And the reason for the no-show is related to the issue with Baker incriminating him last week, as is also mentioned in the last paragraph of that article. As I have said several times before in regard to Baker: MORE TO COME. He has flipped on Rosenstein and Andy, maybe Comey too. Baker was Chief General Counsel for the FBI and was in on all the key meetings about everything. Since several of the fbi clowns are under investigation they dont want rosenstein to testify publicly or privately where it will be leaked such that the others see his testimony. In addition Rosenstein has to deal with the fact that a top, top dog- ie Baker- has incriminated him and he does not dare to perjure himself before the committee or before the fbi because he thinks perjury traps are for others, not him. MORE TO COME. The rats are cannibalizing each other now. Rosenstein is trying to run out the clock to the midterms so that the house committee will get off his arse. That will probably work. Except the republicans may appoint a special prosecutor during the lame duck period so that it will continue after they become a minority.