Rosanne canceled

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CaptainObvious, May 29, 2018.

  1. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Hahahahah, so you watched Tugger Carlson too then? I was wondering when you guys would bring up Sharpton!
     
    #141     May 31, 2018
  2. Max E.

    Max E.


    Laughing is not an argument, and sorry bro i was too busy with my girlfriend to watch tucker carlson but i did see it earlier today so why dont you explain to us how Sharpton deserves a job.
     
    #142     May 31, 2018
  3. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    When the right wing conservatives start giving a shit about gays and trans other than using them as a whatabout tool to bludgeon liberals with.
     
    #143     May 31, 2018
  4. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    c'mon now, you're digging a video from what, 40 yrs ago of some baptist minister and trying to equate it to current events?
     
    #144     May 31, 2018
    Tony Stark and exGOPer like this.
  5. Max E.

    Max E.


    In other words, anything a liberal says and does is acceptable as long as we get rid of the conservatives, gotcha man, thats a fine philosophy!.
     
    #145     May 31, 2018
  6. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    See, the reason this is whataboutism is because you bring up Sharpton AFTER the Roseanne episode - it's like Hannity supporters starting a boycott campaign against Maddow AFTER Hannity was being boycotted for Seth Rich conspiracies.

    If you really cared about Sharpton and Reid's bigotry, why didn't the right wing run a campaign against them? You know why? Because the right wing doesn't have a leg to stand on when it comes to protesting anti-gay bigotry.
     
    #146     May 31, 2018
  7. Max E.

    Max E.


    Joy Reids came from a decade ago, Sharpton actually got people killed.
     
    #147     May 31, 2018
  8. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    You are seriously equating what Sharpton said 40 years ago to what is acceptable today?
     
    #148     May 31, 2018
  9. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    They should've taken Al's sitcom!
     
    #149     May 31, 2018
    exGOPer likes this.
  10. Good1

    Good1

    No I didn't say the founder (the first and only prophet) was liberal. I was just noting that your description of a concept called Islamic liberal, specifically, their sexual mores, compared to a concept called Islamic conservatives, differ from the sexual mores of the founder of their religion, mainly in that they (the liberals) do not prey upon girls under the legal age of a given country. But if it was legal to engage 9 year old girls (or boys) sexually, would Islamic liberals be OK with that?

    I was just inquiring if it was possible Barack could be, or have been an Islamic liberal, with sexual mores that were at least better than the founder of the religion.

    Nothing wrong with marrying a trans and keeping fidelity to the marriage contract. Something wrong with deception about it, if that is in fact what happened. Shows a will and an ability to deceive on a grand scale. Leads to questions about other grand deceptions. Nothing wrong with being a liberal Islamo-supremacist. Something wrong with deceiving the public about it while in high office.
     
    #150     May 31, 2018