Ron Paul...Ugh, will he ever grow up?

Yes, it does just show that a lot of voters are absolute ignorant morons. Ron Paul and Obama come from philosphies that are as far apart as you can get. One is for Liberty & honors individual natural God given rights & self determination, and the other is for a 'benevolent' Socialism controlled by the 'elites' who know whats best for all the easily manipulated peons. While they may appear to agree on some social points, that would be only a superficial similarity. They come from very different ways of looking at the world.

 

You should read up on Ron Paul's social views. Ron Paul is pro-life.

In an Oct. 27, 1999 speech to Congress, Ron Paul said:

“I am strongly pro-life. I think one of the most disastrous rulings of this century was Roe versus Wade. I do believe in the slippery slope theory. I believe that if people are careless and casual about life at the beginning of life, we will be careless and casual about life at the end. Abortion leads to euthanasia. I believe that.”

During a May 15, 2007, appearance on the Fox News talk show Hannity and Colmes, Ron Paul argued that his pro-life position was consistent with his libertarian values, asking, “If you can’t protect life then how can you protect liberty?” Additionally, Ron Paul said that since he believes libertarians support non-aggression, libertarians should oppose abortion because abortion is “an act of aggression” against a fetus.

At the GOP Values Voter Presidential Debate on Sep 17, 2007, Ron Paul was asked what he will do to restore legal protection to the unborn:

“As an O.B. doctor of thirty years, and having delivered 4,000 babies, I can assure you life begins at conception. I am legally responsible for the unborn, no matter what I do, so there’s a legal life there. The unborn has inheritance rights, and if there’s an injury or a killing, there is a legal entity. There is no doubt about it.”

http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/

 

Ron Paul 's allegiance is to the USA. Do you want him to have his first allegiance to zionist criminal Israel?

 

Yes indeed. Nobody is going to win the Whitehouse without believing that the Constitution is a "living document" that needs to be "interpreted" according to "the current times" - meaning that it means something other than what it says.

 

nor should they. advancements in human knowledge require that things be interpeted according to current times. when cases come before the supreme court about the internet or genetics,two things the writers of the consititution had no concept of, how should they be decided when the constitution is silent on those issues?

 

LOL...

There are hundreds of social issues... thanks for writing 1. Confirmation bias at its best.

I think the more important aspect about social issues is that Paul reserves the rights of states to vote on them. He opposes the federal government from having jurisdiction over abortion as you stated or any other issues.

 

Republicans tend to favor state's rights over democrats. Ron Paul a Republican from the libertarian wing of the party.

 

Traditional Republicans like Paul... yes. But there is too few of them unfortunately.

Most prominent Republicans support big government and expansion of federal powers. Bush is the #1 example. Don't believe their words... review their voting records.

 

The fact of the matter is that young voters did not vote for Ron Paul because his social views align more with the democrats.