Ron Paul...Ugh, will he ever grow up?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by a_person, Jun 20, 2009.

  1. Hmm, the gangs of Mosavi??? As always the palestinian islamonazis never miss an opportunity to side with the wrong crowd and support the worst most oppressive and undemocratic regimes.

    Personally I could not care less, Mosavi, Ahmadinejad, Khomeini, Khamenei... they are all America/Israel hating Allahu Akbar screaming Islamo-nazi fundamentalists.

    It's ironic though that Ron Paul did not support a resolution against violence and in support of democracy. It's unfortunate that the Palestinians have once again sided with the tyrants and oppressors. No surprises in both cases though.
     
    #21     Jun 21, 2009
  2. TGregg

    TGregg

    #22     Jun 21, 2009
  3.  
    #23     Jun 21, 2009
  4. A lot of people (younger electorate) like Ron Paul because of his social views... which allign better with a Democrat than with a Republican. Ron Paul is a libertarian so don't forget that. Financially, yes... Ron Paul and Obama could not be any further away. Socially on the other hand, they are very similar. Don't confuse yourself.
     
    #24     Jun 21, 2009
  5.  
    #25     Jun 21, 2009
  6. Ron Paul didn't vote for it, because it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
    Read your fuckin constitution and realize that it's Ron Paul (1) vs 434 Sheep.

    If only more didn't just go along with the Patriot Act and voted against it like Ron Paul, perhaps we wouldn't be in the situation we are in today.
     
    #26     Jun 21, 2009
  7. Dr. Ron Paul ALWAYS opposes resolutions that advise foreign governments how to run their affairs:
    He has refused to condemn Robert Mugabe’s violence against Zimbabwean citizens (421-1),
    to call on Vietnam to release political prisoners (425-1)
    to ask the League of Arab States to help stop the killing in Darfur (425-1).
     
    #27     Jun 21, 2009
  8. This is complete nonsense, there is nothing unconstitutional about resolutions on foreign affairs. There is not a word in the constitution disallowing resolutions in favor of democracy and/or against violence in foreign countries.

    You're right, he voted against a number of purely symbolic resolutions condemning violence, oppression and anti-democratic actions and that's exactly why he is widely regarded as a fringe loony politician and his support tops out at 5%.
     
    #28     Jun 21, 2009
  9. Right... And your idea of democracy is calling people who think their votes were not counted "Mousavi thugs"? And your idea of supporting democracy is whining all day long about the only democracy in the Middle East while not a single one of your arab/muslim countries is truly democratic (as the situation in Iran amply demonstrates). Did not your "democracy loving" palestinian brethren widely support Saddam Husein when he invaded Kuwait?

    Do you ever learn? Nah, not really according to this article:

    Palestinian Hamas members are helping the Iranian authorities crush street protests
    ...Hamas formally welcomed incumbent Ahmadinejad's ostensible reelection victory on Saturday.

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1245184851049&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

    Anyway, enough about the I/P conflict already, the thread was about Ran Paul until you showed up and as a typical psychopath tried to turn it into the only topic that you're obsessed with.
     
    #29     Jun 21, 2009
  10. #30     Jun 21, 2009