i have spent zero time looking for the answers to your request... you're a waste of time.... you are almost as bad as zzZZZ.
Good, it was a trick question anyways. The SC has in fact overturned a conviction before, but the defendant was retried and reconvicted...
you do realize it means nothing... the courts are rigged.. the judges don't follow the law many times... just one big crime family. if you want to see how corrupt the prosecutors are watch this video testimony of traficant's witness Detore.... they took an honest guy and made him want to shoot his brains out. they sent an innocent congressman to jail. the judge didn't allow most of his evidence. and no dumbass.. this isnt off topic. http://www.traficant-update.com/detore.htm
ROFLMMFGDAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO It must suck to be you Rat. Everything's rigged in your mind. What a sad way to exist... You're also a sorry excuse for an American too. You come here claiming how you know how laws are written, and enacted, and still you do not know how it is possible for a new law to replace an old law, like how the 1954 IRS code replaced the 1939 IRS code. And with your remark about how "the judges don't follow the law many times", you obviously hate the Constitution too, since you disapprove of the checks and balances that our great Founding Fathers put in place on the 3 branches of govt. The Congress does its' job of passing laws, and the courts interpret the meaning of those laws, and give definitions to the words contained in them - words like income, voluntary, and soverign individual..... If Congress doesn't like the way that the courts are interpreting what they passed, then they have the power to change the law. That's how it works, Rat. Go ask your mommy, she'll tell you........
tell me einstein... whose that on the BOAT??? LMAOOOOOOOOOOO <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PU-XXy99xVw"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PU-XXy99xVw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
there always ARE things to do about "it" if u want to... there are cases of banks who lost their licences for "inappropriate" behaviour, ie not demonstrably illegal behaviour, but so unethical in nature that the regulators decided to withdraw the right to operate as a business etc... but more generally what u wanna do is go thru the right channels and change the law... your system is rules-based => whats not explicitly forbidden is allowed... the brits' is principles-based, eg u vouch that u are not misrepresenting such & such in a material way etc... not perfect either but much more ethical... but where it doesn't work for certain is if everybody wants to live by his/her own laws...
You're forgetting his worst offense of all: He <b>personally</b> put an innocent man in prison! (No joke)
typical brainless libertarian so who's shagging dagny these days hank? u've finally gotten over the "desire"?
LMAO at the druggie..... Here's how stupid you really are RM. I voted for the legalization of pot for medical reasons here in Cali. But a dipshit like you believes that you have to get the whole f'in 9 yards and make ALL drugs legal, no matter what the circumstances. Here's the real kicker, you believe that this is the way to change the system. Like said way back then, it'll never be that way, you gotta change things little at a time. But in your rigid beliefs, no compromise is allowed. If it wasn't for guys like that, trying to abuse the system to make himself seem legal, people that are honestly trying to do the right thing and help those with a medical need wouldn't be hassled. And then once people got used to that, you take another baby step. And so on, and so on.... You sound like the typical 20 something, gimme gimme gimme type guy that hasn't figured out how to look beyond his own personal needs at the moment. Real dumb....