Not true.If I'm wrong I will admit it http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=226343&perpage=6&pagenumber=3
There is no such thing as "noncombat troops". The troops there are getting shot at and attacked with IEDs just as they have since they first occupied Iraq. Labeling troops in a war zone "noncombat" is like saying that the war in Libya does not require congressional authorization because we didn't put troops on the ground. Yes, Obama has made this argument. By Obama's reasoning we could nuke a country and it wouldn't be a war. What a first class asshole.
1.Combat troops have left 2.Nobody forced the troops there to join the military 3.Before being elected Obama clearly said he would leave 50000 troops there 4.I would tell the troops there that I voted for obama because he would pull more troops out faster then mccain...and he has pulled 100000 troops out.I did not vote for Obama because I thought he would pull all troops out because he clearly said he wasnt,only dumb asses like you seemed to have missed the the nemerous times he said he was leaving 50000 troops there.I would also tell our troops that I would vote for the guy who would bring them home faster then Obama
NO they haven't moron and repeating this over and over won't make it true stupid. Change of subject. He said he would end the war. Which is has NOT done. You know the war HE said we should have never fought in the first place. And yet we're still there and Americans are still dying. And just how many troops who have been or are currently deployed do you know personally? As a rule they don't normally hang around dumb ass bleeding heart stupid delusional socialists like you.
When Obama tells a blatant lie that 50,000 troops in a war zone are somehow not "combat troops" you defend him. If George W. Bush stated the same sort of nonsense you have no trouble calling him a liar.