STILL not funny...well...except where you misspelled instruments. THAT is kinda funny given your obsession over such pettiness.
Let me guess you always failed the what doesn't belong part of sesame street and analogies are an enigma for you. Self-evident to those devoid of higher IQ.(yes you ricter, rcg , ak you all failed the test) Here's why you are wrong. IQ is an endogenous factor directly measuring"quality". So the "fight" in the dog is CLEARLY represented by IQ. Whereas the "size" of the dog is one of physical dimensions telling you "nothing " about the quality of ability. sheesh
let me say as dense as some of ricters arguments are, he poses them as part of a very strategic leftist plan. ricter thinks in systems and anticipates arguments by a step or more... consequently I am pretty sure his IQ is above average... probably well above. he is a worthy foe.
Well, at least we've matured enough to go from Romeny looks like our next President, to Romney really?? and The Obama landslide. So, even ET can mature, good.
Gotta agree with this assertion. Bigarrow is not well endowed in the brains department. I'm not sure why anyone would bother engaging him in a discussion or debate as you would likely get a more meaningful response from a fence-post in the yard. Arguing with brass, RCG, mrbill or bigarrow seems a waste of precious time. I suppose that, however, is the purpose of P&R. Guess its just become clear to me how pointless it is to argue with these types, they are barely animate objects.