come on, this has been a reasonable thread. sure you are spinning for some bad polls but you have not been purposely misleading... now you are coming with this b.s. you wrote this.... after I said I saw Karl Rove say some of the map had months old polls. and note... while I do not recall which state he mentioned... it was a swing state and he implied or said we all know this one will go romney when the polls become current.
The methodology of Karl Roves maps is to use polls within the last 30 days,if there are none in the last 30 days he uses older ones.That is a very good methodology which is why I use his electoral map even though he is a solid right winger. Don't like Karl's map,feel free to post a credible electoral map showing Romney winning
I just went to the RCP websites. These are the toss up states according to them and there are plenty of electoral votes to sway the election to either side. Arizona (11) Colorado (9) Florida (29) Iowa (6) Michigan (16) Missouri (10) New Hampshire (4) North Carolina (15) Ohio (18) Virginia (13) Wisconsin (10) -- I personally would put in a few more states in the toss up category, instead of giving them to Obama. So to me this looks like a wide open election. Which is a great spot to be in for Romney to be in prior to the convention. As Rove said post convention many of these states will swing to Romney. I also note. CA with it 55 electoral votes is a beast. Obama would like piddly without CA. I can see why Obama and the dems cater to illegals.
The polling wouldn't justify that.It only looks like a wide open election to you because you choose to ignore the polls
What a crock of shit. I just presented you the data from the RCP website. The one you have been quoting. They put those states in the toss up category.
Which is why I don't use RCP electoral map.Why wouldn't RCP have many of those states leaning Obama when the polls clearly show they are leaning Obama