You are still lying. 1. lie. You did not provide evidence... you provided a link to slate which stated that revenues went up just not as much as their model. Now according to the terms of the deal I made... you should leave et. As you have produced not data or facts. 2. deception I taught you that there is no proof that life evolved from non life. I do not deny some evolution. Before I came to ET and read the links of some of the honest thinkers here... I fully believed in evolution. Note... inorganic to organic is not - non life evolving to life. Which is what we were arguing over. Organic means almost nothing. Its is a throwback word to alchemy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound Vitalism The word "organic" is historical, dating back to the 1st century.[citation needed] For many centuries, Western alchemists believed in vitalism. This is the theory that certain compounds could be synthesized only from their classical elements â Earth, Water, Air, and Fire â by action of a "life-force" (vis vitalis) possessed only by organisms. Vitalism taught that these "organic" compounds were fundamentally different from the "inorganic" compounds that could be obtained from the elements by chemical manipulation. Vitalism survived for a while even after the rise of modern atomic theory and the replacement of the Aristotelian elements by those we know today. It first came under question in 1824, when Friedrich Wöhler synthesized oxalic acid, a compound known to occur only in living organisms, from cyanogen.[citation needed] A more decisive experiment was Wöhler's 1828 synthesis of urea from the inorganic salts potassium cyanate and ammonium sulfate. Urea had long been considered to be an "organic" compound, as it was known to occur only in the urine of living organisms. Wöhler's experiments were followed by many others, where increasingly complex "organic" substances were produced from "inorganic" ones without the involvement of any living organism.[citation needed]
First, I said I wouldn't take any Internet Political Quotient test. Been there, done that. As for the bet, unless it is enforced by moderators who can ckeck IPs, the bet has no meaning. If Joe changes his mind, you'll be the second to know.
I see you're all giddy, now that there can be no enforced bet. But the snail trail of your cowardice still glistens in the moonlight.
You didn't say that when I originally posted the bet.. could that be because you thought it would be after the the election and had NO INTENTION of fulfilling your end of the deal? I will straight up tell you I won't post for 3 months if I lose. you have my word.
Jem, and I don't say this lightly, I think you are pathological. While I hurl insults at those who offend me, and although you have offended me as well, I genuinely think you go the extra mile in the direction of crazy.